Film, Media & TV75 mins ago
New space Junk?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7254 540.stm
obviously many people more clued up than me decided that this was the best solution but surely now we have thousands of bits of debris orbiting the earth causing danger for future missions. Can anyone explain why this was the best solution? Could they for example not have somehow got it to renenter and burn up?
obviously many people more clued up than me decided that this was the best solution but surely now we have thousands of bits of debris orbiting the earth causing danger for future missions. Can anyone explain why this was the best solution? Could they for example not have somehow got it to renenter and burn up?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Loosehead. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This was the best solution because the Chinese shot down a satellite last year
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/01/18/c hina.missile/index.html
Come on stay with the program!
You don't actually believe all that tosh about cleaning up space do you?
This is a cover story to provide a fig leaf of deniability about space based weapons whilst still playing anything you can do with the Chinse
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/01/18/c hina.missile/index.html
Come on stay with the program!
You don't actually believe all that tosh about cleaning up space do you?
This is a cover story to provide a fig leaf of deniability about space based weapons whilst still playing anything you can do with the Chinse