Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Charged with abusing her position of trust by sexual misconduct.
27 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/35cw4d4
/// Patel pleaded guilty to two charges of abusing her position of trust by sexual misconduct.///
If that is all she is guilty of the sentence should not be too harsh.
No mention of the word paedophilia, or is it only the male of the species that can be called paedophiles?
/// Patel pleaded guilty to two charges of abusing her position of trust by sexual misconduct.///
If that is all she is guilty of the sentence should not be too harsh.
No mention of the word paedophilia, or is it only the male of the species that can be called paedophiles?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Two innocent 15yr olds seduced and sexually violated by this femme fatale,who really didnt know what was happening to them.
Looking at her photograph.........I would have given her one.
But no condemnation of the schoolboys.......bless them.
But at least we know that they will get counselling .....for all the use. that will do.
Looking at her photograph.........I would have given her one.
But no condemnation of the schoolboys.......bless them.
But at least we know that they will get counselling .....for all the use. that will do.
"or is it only the male of the species that can be called paedophiles?"
No, both sexes can be
but the defination of paedophile is somebody who expresses sexual interest in prepubescent children, which is generally taken to be 13 or below, not 15.
(I'm not defending her at all BTW, just explaining why the use of the word paedophile would have been incorrect in this case)
No, both sexes can be
but the defination of paedophile is somebody who expresses sexual interest in prepubescent children, which is generally taken to be 13 or below, not 15.
(I'm not defending her at all BTW, just explaining why the use of the word paedophile would have been incorrect in this case)
/// but the defination of paedophile is somebody who expresses sexual interest in prepubescent children, which is generally taken to be 13 or below, not 15.///
That may well be Chuck in general terms, but 16 is the legal age of consent.
Had it been a 37 year old male teacher who had sexual intercourse with two 15 year old girl pupils, then a completely different attitude would have been taken, and paedophile would have been only one of the numerous labels hung on him.
That may well be Chuck in general terms, but 16 is the legal age of consent.
Had it been a 37 year old male teacher who had sexual intercourse with two 15 year old girl pupils, then a completely different attitude would have been taken, and paedophile would have been only one of the numerous labels hung on him.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.