One of my pals' eldest has started Philosophy as one A Level option, and I was chatting about the Philosophy of Religion, and how it relates to Theology.
And this came up ...
People say prayers.
But God is omniscient, and sees into everyone's hearts.
So He already knows everything that you are telling him ...
... because He knows EVERYTHING.
And because He also takes care of us (!), He has already decided how to act on the basis of the facts that you are telling him when you pray.
So you are telling God something He already knows, and either ...
Asking Him to do something He has already decided to do (waste of time), or
Asking Him to change His mind. BUT ... because God is infallible, the decision He has already made is, by definition, the correct one, so He will not change His mind, because you are asking Him to abandon the correct decision, and replace it with a wrong decision (also a waste of time).
So, either way, praying is, of necessity, a waste of time.
Prayer - like faith, is not about communcating with God (or any deity) - it's about the human comfort derived from ritual, and the belief that something somewhere is in control of everything.
That is because Man does not like to think there is 'nothing' looking after us, and death is the end, so Man comforts himself with those belief systems - be it God, Mohammed, or an eclipse of the sun - the thinking and psychology is the same.
People who exploit that belief system for their own ends become religious leaders, people not in need of the comfort system become atheists.
Surely the point is in the act of saying it yourself. And even if God knows you are going to pray, and what about it, that requires that therefore you have to pray in order for what He knew to be correct!
In general as soon as you introduce omni-anything into a debate you can find yourself going round in circles. There are two solutions: impose theoretical limits on God, so that omniscience means "knowledge of all that can be known", etc. -- so that, perhaps, God does not after all know certain things because they cannot (at least "at the time") be known. The second solution is, of course, to remove God from the debate entirely.
It doesn't follow. God may be wanting you to ask under a, 'if you don't ask, you don't get', view of things. Who knows what benefits that might bring ? So it's not a case of changing God's mind.
Although one can descend into the free will and, 'does God know what decision you are going to make anyway', discussion if you wish.
JJ - "In that case, AH, praying does not need to be done in a structured way, or at a so called place of worship, right?"
Indeed.
My recall of the bible is understandably sketchy, but there is something about not praying on street corners imagining that the more people see you, the more relavent your prayers are - and then something about going somehere quiet to commune with God in private.
As a discipline, Philosophy teaches young people to take a combination of facts and opinions, to analyse them, to assess the validity of each, and to formulate their own argument based on the information to hand.
In short ... it trains them to cut through the crap.
It's only wrong in the same way that talking to your imaginary friend is wrong. Who says god is infallible anyway, I can see a few screw ups around that would prove otherwise!
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.