whodunnit

[dove]

whats your views on Princess Dianas death. Was it an accident or something more sinister?

[Andy008]

That I fail to see why 8 years later people still insist on going on and on and on about it. Whether it was an assassination or an accident we will never know.

She is dead - as is not coming back, ever, period, per se.

Like the death of Jean Charles de Menezes it was tragic and upsetting but these things happen and people have got to realise life is not fair.

[kev100]

She told friends, and made no secret of it that she was going to marry a "black man" and that would show them, (the royal family)

Had she married Dodi Fayed she would have had to change her religion to Islam, and then she died under mysterious cicumstances.

The death being suspicious works for me.

[hopalong]

It was an accident nothing sinister.    I would people would let it rest it's happened leave it

[juliely]

Who cares, after all this time, let it rest.

[dmsjps]

It was murder and if someone murdered anyone in my family I would not let it rest until it was out in the open and the person/people who organised it were in prison.

[bernardo]

Accident obviously.  If anybody wanted to murder her, they would not have done it by such a clumsy, convoluted and unreliable method.

[Cetti]

I don't suppose we will ever know the truth, but there are many things that happened that just don't make sense or add up. Just a few:

1) She made the fact widely known that  she would die in a car crash.

2) Why did it take an hour or more for the ambulance to reach the hospital?

3) She was immediately embalmed before an autopsy could be carried out - illegal under French law.

[kick3m0n]

I'd imagine people who were around following the deaths of JFK, Marilyn Monroe etc got just as bored with this sort of question as I am now................  And taking those two deaths as good examples, I'll bet we'll get bored to death for many years to come with more tedious and utterly pointless debate.   Guess what folks......you'll never know the truth!!!!

[RogK]

Accident. I completely echo Bernardo's post.

[dontaskme]

if she was wearing a seat belt she wouldnt be dead.

[undercovers]

why all these theories??

women in car not wearing a seat belt, being driven at high speed by a drunk bodyguard, who was also taking medication that does not react well with alcohol... result fatal crash - why so suprised? tragic yes, Suspicious NO.

if you want to blame someone blame dodi who was changing his plans without telling secut#rity what he wanted to do and forced his driver to work on his night off (e.g. after he's been drinking) - and had a habit of firing people if they didn't do exactly what he wanted when he wanted - prob why the guy agreed to drive after having a few beers etc. but really it was ages ago and not worth going on about anymore - also i don't think you can compare this death to that of jean charles de menezes as the who cases have nothing in common

[Dark Angel]

An Accident, pure and simple.

[Ward-Minter]

A scarlett woman in a German car, driving in France with an Arab!!   And she was suppose to be an ambassador of the UK????

 

Don't think she was suited as the future mother of the King of England somehow.

 

Besides Mercs are safe, very safe. Seatbelt or not.

[hopalong]

ward-minter Prince William is NOT the futrue kings of England   he is the future king of Grat Britain and Nothern Ireland.  NOT England

[johnbjohn]

She was embalmed soon after the "accident" because she was pregnant to a foriegner who was islamic.

The two of them were killed because she was pregnant and that would mean that the future king of the U.K. would have an islamic brother.

There was just to much in this to be an accident.Saying all this we should just let the poor people rest in peace.

[hopalong]

Do we know for sure that Dodi wasn't the REAL target by his enemies

[bernardo]

I don't suppose we will ever know the truth, but there are many things that happened that just don't make sense or add up. Just a few:

1) She made the fact widely known that  she would die in a car crash.

2) Why did it take an hour or more for the ambulance to reach the hospital?

3) She was immediately embalmed before an autopsy could be carried out - illegal under French law.

1. No she didn't.  She wrote the prediction in a private letter to a friend, and it did not come to light until a few months ago.

2. Because the French ambulance people use the method of stabilising a person in location before taking them to hospital.  In the USA they use the opposite method which is known as "scoop and run".  Statistically, the USA scoop-and-run method is more likely to save lives, but in the case of Princess Diana, it would not have made a difference because she was mortally wounded anyway.

3. Don't know.

Questions for the Conspiracy Theorists:

1. How do you arrange an accident in a car which has only just been chosen as a substitute for the intended car?  Was Mr Fayed - who authorised the choice of car - part of the conspiracy to murder his own son?
2. How do you ensure the death or permanent amnesia of all the people in the car?
3. How do you ensure that the victims are not wearing seat-belts?
4. How do you ensure that the driver is drunk and on drugs?
5. How do you ensure that the driver goes on the route of the accident and through the lethal tunnel with no crash barriers?
6. Why do you choose such a clumsy, unreliable and convoluted method of assassinating somebody?

[dove]

  at last someone who seems to know, tell me more tell me more x

[dove]

at least u all got sommat 2 say!!!!!