ChatterBank2 mins ago
THE WEARING OF REAL FUR!!
43 Answers
Any thoughts on the above?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by CailinDeas. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I disapprove of fur being worn when the animal was merely killed for its pelt. I don't feel it is morally to kill for that reason.
I have no problems with using all of an animal killed for food, as then it was killed as part of the food chain which seems acceptable to me as long as there was no suffering.
Some years back someone bought me a fur hat, like the Russians are seen to wear. Never felt I wanted to wear it though. Must be in a cupboard somewhere.
I have no problems with using all of an animal killed for food, as then it was killed as part of the food chain which seems acceptable to me as long as there was no suffering.
Some years back someone bought me a fur hat, like the Russians are seen to wear. Never felt I wanted to wear it though. Must be in a cupboard somewhere.
No strong feelings either .
I've got a lovely real fur coat hanging around here which I inherited from an ancient aunt via my late ma in law .
Last year in that freezing winter I was very tempted to wear it .The animal it was made from was probably killed donkeys years before PETA started their campaign . Mr S. bought me a faux fur for Christmas but it looks so real I've not worn it yet and it hasn't been really cold this winter .
Mind you I don't suppose we get many red paint slingers in my little neck of the woods :)
I've got a lovely real fur coat hanging around here which I inherited from an ancient aunt via my late ma in law .
Last year in that freezing winter I was very tempted to wear it .The animal it was made from was probably killed donkeys years before PETA started their campaign . Mr S. bought me a faux fur for Christmas but it looks so real I've not worn it yet and it hasn't been really cold this winter .
Mind you I don't suppose we get many red paint slingers in my little neck of the woods :)
I have several fur coats that I have inherited from various relatives.
I am really torn between wearing them or not. They are beautiful and very warm. And the animals they came from are a very long time dead now...at least 50 years.
(IMHO synthetic substitutes do not look anything like as good and are not as warm.)
I cannot bring myself to throw them out, because I know that their previous owners saved for years to be able to buy them and wore them with such pride.
On the few occasions that I have worn them, they felt luxurious and glamorous. Cannot say I ever had any adverse reaction from anyone.
I am really torn between wearing them or not. They are beautiful and very warm. And the animals they came from are a very long time dead now...at least 50 years.
(IMHO synthetic substitutes do not look anything like as good and are not as warm.)
I cannot bring myself to throw them out, because I know that their previous owners saved for years to be able to buy them and wore them with such pride.
On the few occasions that I have worn them, they felt luxurious and glamorous. Cannot say I ever had any adverse reaction from anyone.
I have two entirely polar viewpoints on this, the first being that if you are prepared to enslave and kill an animal for food purposes then there is no conflict in enslaving and killing an animal for fur, as no-one HAS to eat meat to survive. The second is that in an ideal I would like to see both practices stopped, but the world is not ideal- therefore in order not to be a hypocrite I have no serious moral obligation to fur wearing PROVIDING the animal has a decent quality of life prior to a humane death.
As a meat eater, For me it depends whether the animal has been killed for food. In that case it would be almost irresponsible not to use as much of it as possible. Having ended its life for one purpose, you almost have a duty to give that death as much meaning as you can.
I'm probably not expressing that very well but hopefully you know what I mean.
However, the sight of baby seals being clubbed to death just for their pelts is a truly sickening and disturbing one.
Similarly, rhinos or elephants being killed just for their horns and tusks, it's just wrong.
I'm probably not expressing that very well but hopefully you know what I mean.
However, the sight of baby seals being clubbed to death just for their pelts is a truly sickening and disturbing one.
Similarly, rhinos or elephants being killed just for their horns and tusks, it's just wrong.
evian- if cowhide was not made into leather, then all the skins of cows etc after the meat has been taken, would be burned... that is wasteful... if you must kill an animal then at least do it some justice by not binning half of it.
with fur the skin is removed an the meat discarded! in some countries they strip the animals while still alive... then leave the skinned animal to suffer and die...
it is a disgusting an uneccesary trade
i have been veggie for about 20 years so ideally id like to see no fur or leather, suede, sheepskin etc AT ALL... but as the animal is already dead, and that wont stop, i can see why using their skins makes sense...
animals skins are ONLY acceptable as a byproduct of the food industry.
with fur the skin is removed an the meat discarded! in some countries they strip the animals while still alive... then leave the skinned animal to suffer and die...
it is a disgusting an uneccesary trade
i have been veggie for about 20 years so ideally id like to see no fur or leather, suede, sheepskin etc AT ALL... but as the animal is already dead, and that wont stop, i can see why using their skins makes sense...
animals skins are ONLY acceptable as a byproduct of the food industry.
-- answer removed --