ChatterBank1 min ago
Who Believes In Punishments Meeted Out Under Sharia Law ?
50 Answers
hands chopped off for thieves etc etc . what are your views . i do not believe in sharia , i think it is barbaric but.....arent i a hypocrite ? because for child murderers and rapists of children and pensioners and weak defensless people , i could kill them all in the most brutal way.
hmmm...this makes for a good start to a sunday morning LOL
hmmm...this makes for a good start to a sunday morning LOL
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by beezaneez. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No mercy has it right here. Sharia law is an uncivilised and uneducated product of an unenlightened religion. There are those that would have it on the statute book here, given the chance.
Beezaneez...I am sure that you don't really mean what you are saying, because you would only be sinking down to their level if you did.
Beezaneez...I am sure that you don't really mean what you are saying, because you would only be sinking down to their level if you did.
maybe it's because you hear of such vile crimes going relatively unpunished. That sometimes i think what i would do to paedophiles and rapists, as far as i am concerned they should have no life, none where they can either ply their trade in children, or go on to rape, so a life sentence would be appropriate
Keyplus and lynda, i think that's understandable rather than hypocritical. We can all make a civilised judgment in what we think is right. But when you hear stories about abused children ir if it personally affected you, of course you might feel differently. But outraged anger isn't always the best way to make laws.
Under shria law it is possible to 'buy' your way out of any thing including murder by paying 'blood money'.
That is why a Saudi Prince was able to get away with killing a servant who he had had a homosexual relationship with. The servant was murdered to stop him revealing the Prince's sexuality. Then the servants family were forced to accept 'blood money' and drop the murder charge.
That is why a Saudi Prince was able to get away with killing a servant who he had had a homosexual relationship with. The servant was murdered to stop him revealing the Prince's sexuality. Then the servants family were forced to accept 'blood money' and drop the murder charge.
Under Sharia law it is not allowed to buy your way out. Perhaps in Saudi law it is. As far as Sharia law is concerned it is victim or his immediate dependents who have final say. In case of murder they have 3 rights.
1 - To forgive for nothing if they feel that the person regrets doing what he did and may change his life around and no one would suffer at his/her hands in the future.
2 - To forgive after accepting blood money in case of murder as that money may help them if the victim was the sole bread earner.
3 - Not to forgive and force capital punishment upon the person.
Anything else apart from that could be Saudi, Iranian or any country's law and not the Sharia.
1 - To forgive for nothing if they feel that the person regrets doing what he did and may change his life around and no one would suffer at his/her hands in the future.
2 - To forgive after accepting blood money in case of murder as that money may help them if the victim was the sole bread earner.
3 - Not to forgive and force capital punishment upon the person.
Anything else apart from that could be Saudi, Iranian or any country's law and not the Sharia.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.