Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Bbc News, Integrtion Has Not Worked With Muslims
204 Answers
just heard it on news, they were talking about muslims integrating into germany and merkel now has a massive task on her hands to find a solution to the problem, they talked about the problems that faced france and jaques chirac banning of the burhka etc when he was in charge, german security experts are now saying that they believe isis teams are active in germany asfter coming into the country disquised as refugees , wow really !! .
for me , the fact is that muslims cant intergrate fully with western society, i mean look what they are taught in their koran , such verses here - “Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. Know that God is with the righteous.” Quran 9:123 also here - Quran 8:59-60 / Quran 2:286 / Quran 3:147 / Quran 8:12 /
“Believers, take neither the Jews nor the Christians for your friends. They are friends with one another…” Quran 5:51
so there you have it in black and white, how to hell can these people fit in with us, i cannot see any solution to the problem.
merkel and co have only added to the problems .
for me , the fact is that muslims cant intergrate fully with western society, i mean look what they are taught in their koran , such verses here - “Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. Know that God is with the righteous.” Quran 9:123 also here - Quran 8:59-60 / Quran 2:286 / Quran 3:147 / Quran 8:12 /
“Believers, take neither the Jews nor the Christians for your friends. They are friends with one another…” Quran 5:51
so there you have it in black and white, how to hell can these people fit in with us, i cannot see any solution to the problem.
merkel and co have only added to the problems .
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dieseldick. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
birdy1971 - //Andy-hughes - “... on the subject of Islam, I have made no secret of the fact that my knowledge is basic..”
On the subject of Islam, you're a 'low-information commenter' if ever I saw one. //
Agreed – but as I have pointed out before, the Answerbank does not operate an admissions system based on how much you know about what you wish to speak about. It is welcoming to all-comers, experts, professed experts, novices, and people so ignorant they can’t eat with a knife and fork. So lack of knowledge is no bar to expressing an opinion.
//What a balloon you have proven yourself to be. By your own admission, you know nothing of Islam. You clearly know nothing of the concept of scriptural abrogation. Nor do you know of the Islamic concept of taqiyya. You know nothing about Islam, having never read any Islamic texts. You are operating from a point of zero knowledge and yet have the brass neck to tell those of us who are well versed in Islamic scripture that we're wrong. You display an astonishing arrogance. It would be funny if it weren't so serious.
Ah well, you see, I only have your word that ‘those of us who are well versed …’ are in fact well-versed at all! As I have also said before, reading does not necessarily equate with understanding. If you – and I use the generic term, not you personally – wish to come over as an ‘expert’, then you need to be able to back it up, and lofty pronouncements don’t cut it as far as I am concerned, neither does condescending to people who wish to discuss something, but admit they know little if anything about it.
// And you owe Naomi an apology. //
I wouldn’t hold your breath! Last time I apologised to Naomi she was dismissive and offensive – so that is not going to happen. Naomi is perfectly capable of giving as good as she gets, and I have stated preciously that I object to her tone when addressing me, and I decline to debate directly with her as a consequence – one of the other built-in advantages of the Answerbank, I don’t have to be answerable to her, or indeed to you.
Oh, and asking for an apology for someone else, of someone you have referred to as a ‘balloon’ makes you a hypocrite, but unlike you, I am not judgemental, so we can let that one go, no need to apologise.
//How, in good conscience, can you ridicule and attempt to make a mockery of her arguments when you – by your own admission – are operating from a position of ignorance about the Islamic scriptures?//
Perfectly easily. I have no evidence other than Naomi’s willingness to tell me, that she actually knows anything about Islam at all. She is entitled to her view – as am I – but that does not make her right all the time.
I offer my view. I am not trying to pretend my view is backed up by knowledge, but as I have said, knowledge is not required to have an opinion.
If you don’t like mine, please feel free to ignore my posts, but there really is no need to come on here and ask for apologies or decry me, or insult me personally. If you wish to add to the debate, then please go ahead – if you have more of this level of stuff, then save your time.
On the subject of Islam, you're a 'low-information commenter' if ever I saw one. //
Agreed – but as I have pointed out before, the Answerbank does not operate an admissions system based on how much you know about what you wish to speak about. It is welcoming to all-comers, experts, professed experts, novices, and people so ignorant they can’t eat with a knife and fork. So lack of knowledge is no bar to expressing an opinion.
//What a balloon you have proven yourself to be. By your own admission, you know nothing of Islam. You clearly know nothing of the concept of scriptural abrogation. Nor do you know of the Islamic concept of taqiyya. You know nothing about Islam, having never read any Islamic texts. You are operating from a point of zero knowledge and yet have the brass neck to tell those of us who are well versed in Islamic scripture that we're wrong. You display an astonishing arrogance. It would be funny if it weren't so serious.
Ah well, you see, I only have your word that ‘those of us who are well versed …’ are in fact well-versed at all! As I have also said before, reading does not necessarily equate with understanding. If you – and I use the generic term, not you personally – wish to come over as an ‘expert’, then you need to be able to back it up, and lofty pronouncements don’t cut it as far as I am concerned, neither does condescending to people who wish to discuss something, but admit they know little if anything about it.
// And you owe Naomi an apology. //
I wouldn’t hold your breath! Last time I apologised to Naomi she was dismissive and offensive – so that is not going to happen. Naomi is perfectly capable of giving as good as she gets, and I have stated preciously that I object to her tone when addressing me, and I decline to debate directly with her as a consequence – one of the other built-in advantages of the Answerbank, I don’t have to be answerable to her, or indeed to you.
Oh, and asking for an apology for someone else, of someone you have referred to as a ‘balloon’ makes you a hypocrite, but unlike you, I am not judgemental, so we can let that one go, no need to apologise.
//How, in good conscience, can you ridicule and attempt to make a mockery of her arguments when you – by your own admission – are operating from a position of ignorance about the Islamic scriptures?//
Perfectly easily. I have no evidence other than Naomi’s willingness to tell me, that she actually knows anything about Islam at all. She is entitled to her view – as am I – but that does not make her right all the time.
I offer my view. I am not trying to pretend my view is backed up by knowledge, but as I have said, knowledge is not required to have an opinion.
If you don’t like mine, please feel free to ignore my posts, but there really is no need to come on here and ask for apologies or decry me, or insult me personally. If you wish to add to the debate, then please go ahead – if you have more of this level of stuff, then save your time.
// Div (or Divvy) is an insult in GM. I have no idea where it comes from. //
As a Mancunian myself, I believe that 'divi' originates from the 'dividend', which one received from the co-operative wholesale society, or 'coop', where customers could become in effect, 'shareholders', and collecting one's divi (which was microscopic) became a kind of back-handed insult demonstrating, in a bit of a joke, poverty.
As a Mancunian myself, I believe that 'divi' originates from the 'dividend', which one received from the co-operative wholesale society, or 'coop', where customers could become in effect, 'shareholders', and collecting one's divi (which was microscopic) became a kind of back-handed insult demonstrating, in a bit of a joke, poverty.
According to the Urban Dictionary 'Div' //originates from prison slang in the UK. A job often given to the lowest inmates was to put cardboard dividers into boxes. Someone given this job was a 'divider' or a 'div'. Now used as an insult to those who display stupidity. //
http://
http://
-- answer removed --
// knowledge is not required to have an opinion. //
I have chisels. Now, all I need is a wall. Preferably near to a South Wales railway track…
(fond remembrances of "Maggie been 'ere", facing the slow section into Swansea*. That lasted easily 20 years…).
* the relevance of this will be lost on anyone who never saw the state of the vista of post-Thatcher Swansea, from the train, before a permanent tidy up was achieved, in a later decade. Prince Charles visited, one year and, apocryphally, they had to erect miles of fake conifers, to hide all the mess from his gaze).
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.