It seems to me that as many scientists don't believe that evolution is possible, and that goes for abiogenesis, then a creator God is more plausible than the momentous odds of random natural reactions producing anything worthwhile, let alone a single protein, the odds being 10 to the power of 160. There are only about 10 to the 40 atoms in the whole universe.
YouTube is a mine of information for checking out the opinions of famous scientists.
Also, this obsession with natural reactions being "random" is, presumably, deliberately designed to pull the wool over the eyes of the gullible. Chemical reactions are not nearly so random as all that.
I think most people probably are Agnostics as I consider myself. We dont try to prove there is no Gods as no-one knows. A true Atheist hates religion and tries to disprove it.
I prefer terms "non religious" or "without belief in entities".
I don't accept that non-believers possess any sort of "ism", I see being without belief in an entity as a default and as the person grows from infancy they can CHOOSE to take on a belief in an entity (or multiple entities). What you are saying sounds like some sort of "opt out" where you have to make a belief out of disbelief!