Quizzes & Puzzles13 mins ago
Black Crime
48 Answers
What are your views on the predominance of black crimes of violence especially in the capital?
To even notice it runs the risk of a racist label but can we ignore the facts?
To even notice it runs the risk of a racist label but can we ignore the facts?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Only because an unreasonable distinction has been made. It's important to accept a crime is a crime regardless.
If one feels one culture is overrepresented then one needs to check what needs to change there to prevent crime being attractive to that segment as they grow up. It's leaving it a bit late to try to isolate groups at the 'crime has already been committed' stage. The offenders are already offenders regardless of colour by then.
If one feels one culture is overrepresented then one needs to check what needs to change there to prevent crime being attractive to that segment as they grow up. It's leaving it a bit late to try to isolate groups at the 'crime has already been committed' stage. The offenders are already offenders regardless of colour by then.
//Crime is crime. What difference does the ethnicity of the perpetrator make?//
principle none whatsoever. But the OP isn't asking that question, is it?
As the OP uses black/white as the simple oppositions let's think how a sensible analysis of crime in any particular area Inmight work.
Brixton: 90% Black, 90% of convicted criminals Black.
Brixham: 90% White, 90% of convicted criminals White.
No anomalies here, tight?
Now let's take any borough in East London and observe that, at most, half the population is British-descended white, but the greater percentage of criminals are recent immigrants or the children of recent immigrants.
Would this be an interesting and possibly relevant datum, or would it not?
principle none whatsoever. But the OP isn't asking that question, is it?
As the OP uses black/white as the simple oppositions let's think how a sensible analysis of crime in any particular area Inmight work.
Brixton: 90% Black, 90% of convicted criminals Black.
Brixham: 90% White, 90% of convicted criminals White.
No anomalies here, tight?
Now let's take any borough in East London and observe that, at most, half the population is British-descended white, but the greater percentage of criminals are recent immigrants or the children of recent immigrants.
Would this be an interesting and possibly relevant datum, or would it not?
Talbot, iv lived in the states, have you, iv seen the system and how it works, rich or poor...education is free, have you seen america's prison population statistics, you should check that..really their is a problem.
im not racist correlation statistics...do not add up though, ok its just that *** happens then...
im not racist correlation statistics...do not add up though, ok its just that *** happens then...
actually all this is prophesied in the bible
Biblical references. Scholars have identified Taharqa with Tirhakah, king of Ethiopia (Kush), who waged war against Sennacherib during the reign of King Hezekiah of Judah (2 Kings 19:9; Isaiah 37:9). ... The two snakes in the crown of pharaoh Taharqa show that he was the king of both the lands of Egypt and Nubia.
the fact that we were digging up Taharqa stuff in er Nubia is neither here or there
( we agree that ) The bible is a book of prophecy and not historical fact.
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Tahar qa
so whever you read Taharkah in the bible
it is referring without a doubt to the upsurge in black crime in Lundy 3000 y later
there - you asked my opinion
Biblical references. Scholars have identified Taharqa with Tirhakah, king of Ethiopia (Kush), who waged war against Sennacherib during the reign of King Hezekiah of Judah (2 Kings 19:9; Isaiah 37:9). ... The two snakes in the crown of pharaoh Taharqa show that he was the king of both the lands of Egypt and Nubia.
the fact that we were digging up Taharqa stuff in er Nubia is neither here or there
( we agree that ) The bible is a book of prophecy and not historical fact.
https:/
so whever you read Taharkah in the bible
it is referring without a doubt to the upsurge in black crime in Lundy 3000 y later
there - you asked my opinion