Donate SIGN UP

Free Tommy

Avatar Image
Theland | 21:31 Mon 18th Jun 2018 | Society & Culture
223 Answers
https://youtu.be/6eB52Y7Zva8

There is not doubt Tommy is a political prisoner.
The support he is getting cant be ignored.
Now it is protests, next it will be violence.
People have reached breaking point.
Do you agree?
Gravatar

Answers

161 to 180 of 223rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
fiction-factory - // What was the point? //

It got attention for 'Tommy Robinson'.

That was the point because that is always the point, the only point there will ever be.
I don't think we should be asking why Robinson was prosecuted and imprisoned...
...because it distracts from the real issue/

You do see what I mean now, don't you, Theland and Talbot?

//I think we should ask and keep on asking how it is that the rapists have been allowed to ply their trade for so long. why after two decades of near immunity so few have been prosecuted. And why the mainstream media (instance: BBC on Telford) seem so disinclined to report [it]"//
You post away about the real issue VE.

I'm going to post a few interesting vids for the nice people to ignore.


An interesting fellow is the Imam Tawhidi.




Update from Tommy

https://youtu.be/JeF1_SKRwmU
He tweeted this a couple of days ago but I thought I would wait for the media to pick it up.

https://twitter.com/Imamofpeace/status/1008438164703326209


http://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-the-yazidis-are-on-the-brink-of-extinction-canada-must-do-more

//Nada survived sexual slavery at the hands of ISIL. Recently, in Ontario, she recognized the man who'd enslaved her in Iraq. What's he doing here?//


Answers on a postcard.

Talbot, Well, the poor mite is fleeing war and looking for a safe haven. ... obviously.... innit?
Question Author
Nobody is more politically correct than that idiot Trudeau, so a safe haven for jihadis is no surprise.
I just wish the Canadians would wake up.
Question Author
To all you people who on this thread smirked at Tommys incarceration, I would ask you to reconsider your views in the light of what others have posted, and support Tommy.
It's not hard to get to the truth.
Tommy has been a bad lad in the past, who hasn't?
But his indiscressions to not bar him from being a patriot and capable of seeing injustice in the establishments cover up of Muslim crime, and the slow but sure is.amic takeover of our nation.
You might live in a leafy suburb and insulated from these things, but if so, it is only a matter of time before you and your families will become affected.
They will not acknowledge the obvious and blatant truth Theland because they have been indoctrinated into fearing officialdom. It will always be somebody else’s problem until it directly effected them.
Posted before and I know you won't be bothered about watching this...but the attitude of some of the supposed moderate Muslims in this is shocking.


Theland - // To all you people who on this thread smirked at Tommys incarceration, I would ask you to reconsider your views in the light of what others have posted, and support Tommy. //

I haven't seen anyone 'smirking' at the incarceration of 'Tommy Robinson - merely two opposing views, one that he is a hounded martyred patriot and subject to a police state, and the other that he is a self-publicising egotistical career criminal who is serving a just sentence for a crime he has admitted committing.

// It's not hard to get to the truth. //

No, but it is hard for some to see it and accept it.

// Tommy has been a bad lad in the past, who hasn't? //

I haven't, and neither have other millions of law-abiding citizens. I am not willing to simply shrug my shoulders and smile at the crimes of a man who is intent on breaking the law when it suits his purposes, while shrieking from the rooftops about others doing the same. This perception that he is 'a bit of a lad, but that's just him' is not acceptable. He is a grown man who spends his time pointlessly grandstanding and drawing support from seriously undesirable people.

His indiscressions to not bar him from being a patriot and capable of seeing injustice in the establishments cover up of Muslim crime, and the slow but sure is.amic takeover of our nation. //

They are not 'indiscretions', they are criminal acts for which he is in prison, once again. let's not do as 'Tommy' claims, and gloss over clearly criminal activity shall we? That would make his supporters as bad as the people he claims to be 'saving us' from.

// You might live in a leafy suburb and insulated from these things, but if so, it is only a matter of time before you and your families will become affected. //

You might live in a fantasy where arrogant career criminals are 'patriots' and 'bad lads' - I don't.
andy-hughes, //let's not do as 'Tommy' claims, and gloss over clearly criminal activity shall we?//

But Tommy’s absolutely right. We do gloss over criminal activity – which is why those horrendous crimes against young girls were allowed to continue for so long.
If we are not going to gloss over the crimes of Asian grooming gangs, and no-one would suggest for a moment that we should, then consistency, and avoidance of charged of hypocrisy, means that we can't gloss over 'Tommy's crimes either.

That means taking the line that "He is 'a bit of a lad' who has done a bit of naughty, but hey, who hasn't?" is not going to fly.
His crimes haven't been glossed over - he's in prison. It's just a pity that the powers that be and his critics aren't quite so on the ball with far more serious crimes. Clearly it's not what you've done that counts, it's who you happen to be.
His crimes haven't been glossed over - but my point was to Theland, who clearly is of the opinion that they should be.
Perhaps that’s because Theland thinks that the law under which Tommy was jailed is wrong - which raises a question. Theland gave the example of Nazi Germany where it was law to inform on the Jews, and I used the Suffragettes as an example of what I think were ‘legitimate’ law-breakers, so to speak. So …. being an upright, law-abiding citizen, what do you do when this dilemma is upon you? Do you do what you think is morally right and risk breaking the law – or do you obey the law simply by virtue of the fact that, rightly or wrongly, it is the law? An interesting question which others might like to consider. I’ll post it for them in a separate thread.
If I really thought that my behaviour would be of notable benefit to society as a whole, I would consider breaking the law, and accepting the consequences.


If I thought that my action would benefit no-one but myself, in terms of boosting my posturing rampantly egotistical self-appointed guardianship of the nation's safety, and simultaneously jeopardise the very legal process whose absence I have been protesting about, then I would stay indoors and let justice take its course.
As a bystander it's interesting to note that the vitriol poured out on this thread against Tommy Robinson seems to be quite acceptable whereas similar against the perpetrators of these crimes is only dared by the most reactionary of ABers and is dismissed as bigotry.

161 to 180 of 223rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Free Tommy

Answer Question >>