ChatterBank0 min ago
The Rushing Tide Of Fascism ...
155 Answers
... is taking over this site. After years of copious quotes from Hitler's favourite English newspaper, we are now getting quotes from the far more odious Breibart website, a website which makes Attila the Hun look Liberal.
And they have the gall to suggest Islam is taking over - I haven't seen many quotes from Muslim sites here.
And they have the gall to suggest Islam is taking over - I haven't seen many quotes from Muslim sites here.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Jackthehat, //The general consensus between those on the right (and the far right), on AnswerBank, is that Islam is the *ultimate* face of Fascism in the world, and they tend to truncate any further discussion of any other examples of fascism/fascist actions by flinging that into the works. It works very well as a diversionary tactic, unfortunately.//
This thread is about Islam. No one has deviated from that or truncated discussion. Unless your post is an attempt at a diversionary tactic, which I strongly suspect it is, perhaps you’d consider explaining why, instead of debunking, in a rational manner, the message you’re attacking, you resort to attacking the messenger.
This thread is about Islam. No one has deviated from that or truncated discussion. Unless your post is an attempt at a diversionary tactic, which I strongly suspect it is, perhaps you’d consider explaining why, instead of debunking, in a rational manner, the message you’re attacking, you resort to attacking the messenger.
Canary; // if you find anything untrue about about the quotes from a source you dislike - including Breitbart, instead of ranting with your idiotic analogies about Attila the Hun and Adolf Hitler, just disprove them!
I used one today which was not made by Breitbart but simply recorded there, it was a verbatim account of statements made by a Polish politician, and incidentally, most people on that threat agreed entirely with his sentiment.
I used one today which was not made by Breitbart but simply recorded there, it was a verbatim account of statements made by a Polish politician, and incidentally, most people on that threat agreed entirely with his sentiment.
naomi - I was responding to the post made by IJKLM.
I trust s/he will understand my points even if you cannot.
Canary42 is talking about the nature of threads on AB as he sees them; threads with a high-fascism quota. Threads and quotes heavily peppered with offerings from self-professed right-wing websites/publications.....and in at least one case, extreme far-right.
I don't think appraising IJKLM of that fact could seriously be called a 'diversionary tactic'.
I trust s/he will understand my points even if you cannot.
Canary42 is talking about the nature of threads on AB as he sees them; threads with a high-fascism quota. Threads and quotes heavily peppered with offerings from self-professed right-wing websites/publications.....and in at least one case, extreme far-right.
I don't think appraising IJKLM of that fact could seriously be called a 'diversionary tactic'.
Thanks JtH
I've been on this site long enough to know the various characters that you are dealing with (though not necessariy under this username).
I resolved not to get involved in political discussions on this site, as I believe them to be excessively polarised and ultimately a waste of time and effort.
On this one, however, I think those of us who want to resist the rising tide of far-right fascism have a duty to stand up say so.
I don't want to make a habit of it; and I don't want to repeat myself.
I do want the moderators and management to be aware of the range of views about far-right extremism and how this site is starting to contribute to that trend.
I've been on this site long enough to know the various characters that you are dealing with (though not necessariy under this username).
I resolved not to get involved in political discussions on this site, as I believe them to be excessively polarised and ultimately a waste of time and effort.
On this one, however, I think those of us who want to resist the rising tide of far-right fascism have a duty to stand up say so.
I don't want to make a habit of it; and I don't want to repeat myself.
I do want the moderators and management to be aware of the range of views about far-right extremism and how this site is starting to contribute to that trend.
Jackthehat, Canary’s premise regarding posters here is grossly inaccurate. There is no rising tide of fascism taking over this website. That said, if information from whatever source, be it from what Canary dramatically calls Hitler’s favourite paper or elsewhere, is accurate there is no reason to deem it unacceptable. Nevertheless, clearly in agreement with Canary’s inaccurate premise, you jump enthusiastically on the controversial bandwagon in similar condemnation. Heaven forbid that anyone should mention the real rushing tide of fascism – and more fool those who determinedly refuse to recognise it.
I don't care what anyone thinks, they are as entitled to think whatever they like, however there is a clear leaning to the far right which is no longer balanced by those of us on the left in number and thus the site appears to be very right wing in it's general demeanour if you have a quick look in News or Religion and Spirituality, and like it or not that does not represent the views of everyone who might consider signing up as a member and will put a great many people off. the right wing bubble here is exactly that, a fluke of sorts, and we are losing members over it.
//Canary’s premise regarding posters here is grossly inaccurate. There is no rising tide of fascism taking over this website.//
In your opinion.
///That said, if information from whatever source, be it from what Canary dramatically calls Hitler’s favourite paper or elsewhere, is accurate there is no reason to deem it unacceptable.///
Agreed. Who gets to decide what is 'accurate' and what isn't?
//Nevertheless, clearly in agreement with Canary’s inaccurate premise, you jump enthusiastically on the controversial bandwagon in similar condemnation. //
Pointing out that Breitbart and Stormfront are at the forefront of rightist/fascist disinformation does not mean that I have jumped anywhere enthusiastically, or otherwise.
//Heaven forbid that anyone should mention the real rushing tide of fascism – and more fool those who determinedly refuse to recognise it.//
Yes, no-one did pick up your 16.23 post, did they? Perhaps they didn't want to give you the satisfaction of telling us, again, what the correct answer is.......in your opinion.
In your opinion.
///That said, if information from whatever source, be it from what Canary dramatically calls Hitler’s favourite paper or elsewhere, is accurate there is no reason to deem it unacceptable.///
Agreed. Who gets to decide what is 'accurate' and what isn't?
//Nevertheless, clearly in agreement with Canary’s inaccurate premise, you jump enthusiastically on the controversial bandwagon in similar condemnation. //
Pointing out that Breitbart and Stormfront are at the forefront of rightist/fascist disinformation does not mean that I have jumped anywhere enthusiastically, or otherwise.
//Heaven forbid that anyone should mention the real rushing tide of fascism – and more fool those who determinedly refuse to recognise it.//
Yes, no-one did pick up your 16.23 post, did they? Perhaps they didn't want to give you the satisfaction of telling us, again, what the correct answer is.......in your opinion.
Fascism is a word bandied about by people who have no understanding of what it represents (I've lived through it). The only official definition of Fascism comes from Benito Mussolini, the founder of fascism, in which he outlines three principles of a fascist philosophy.
'1."Everything in the state". The Government is supreme and the country is all-encompasing, and all within it must conform to the ruling body, often a dictator.
2."Nothing outside the state". The country must grow and the implied goal of any fascist nation is to rule the world, and have every human submit to the government.
3."Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong. If you do not agree with the government, you cannot be allowed to live and taint the minds of the rest of the good citizens.'
Sharia ?
'1."Everything in the state". The Government is supreme and the country is all-encompasing, and all within it must conform to the ruling body, often a dictator.
2."Nothing outside the state". The country must grow and the implied goal of any fascist nation is to rule the world, and have every human submit to the government.
3."Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong. If you do not agree with the government, you cannot be allowed to live and taint the minds of the rest of the good citizens.'
Sharia ?
//I share the concerns of the OP. //
Oh really? Is this the same "OP" who takes the non de plume that is exactly the same as a far left momentum mouthpiece and even uses an avatar that is their logo? Is this the same "OP" that was fond of copying and pasting whole tranches of their output, without posting a link (no doubt in order to falsely display clever thought) until caught bang to rights? Meehh. The rabid left have shot their bolt. After decades of dominating the web, and sadly our mainstream media, the people who abhor their duplicity have awoken. They have stopped shrugging their shoulders and doing the windy finger by the temple sign in the hope that they will have to see common sense in the end, whilst getting on with a productive life, and started to push back before it is too late. How it confuses the libtards and luvvies.
Oh really? Is this the same "OP" who takes the non de plume that is exactly the same as a far left momentum mouthpiece and even uses an avatar that is their logo? Is this the same "OP" that was fond of copying and pasting whole tranches of their output, without posting a link (no doubt in order to falsely display clever thought) until caught bang to rights? Meehh. The rabid left have shot their bolt. After decades of dominating the web, and sadly our mainstream media, the people who abhor their duplicity have awoken. They have stopped shrugging their shoulders and doing the windy finger by the temple sign in the hope that they will have to see common sense in the end, whilst getting on with a productive life, and started to push back before it is too late. How it confuses the libtards and luvvies.
