Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

141 to 160 of 167rss feed

First Previous 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Avatar Image
It ain't Answerbank out there in the real world for sure. These idiots would be happy to sit in the road all day debating the rights and wrongs of their unlawful actions whilst the rest of the population can go hang. They won't listen to reason and they care not one fig for others. They believe their cause is just and it is their right to inconvenience as many people...
16:12 Thu 20th Jul 2023
I’m a member of Answerbank, ergo it is my business. Andy’s recollections, and mine are perfectly accurate so why did you write what you did at 13.12.
This is so childish!
Anyone else would get a virtual slap, FGS, give it a rest!!!
This thread is sure to be closed as it has been completely derailed because of a mod's appalling memory. He would rather use it as soap box to be rude an obnoxious as he usually is and for some bizzare reason is won't to do. This was a thread about JSO and not created for your insults and arrogance to be scattered like confetti
You haven’t posted your cop scenario question yet, retro.
Question Author
Oops, apologies.
Remember this from yesterday afternoon -

Zacs - //As usual, naomi is deflecting rather than answering.

Expect her absence from the thread until it ends, and then reappearance on another thread as though nothing has happened. //

And the response from naomi -

// The deflection came from elsewhere, AH - and I'm not absent from the thread. //

And zacs response just before two o'clock yesterday afternoon -

// I’m a member of Answerbank, ergo it is my business. Andy’s recollections, and mine are perfectly accurate so why did you write what you did at 13.12. //

And ....

nothing from Naomi since.

She has disappeared, as I said she would, because she always does.


Or maybe she is just busy.
fripfrip - // Or maybe she is just busy. //

When you've been on here long enough, you'll get to see how some of the regulars work - and how certain ones skip away from being found out in the wrong by simply absenting themselves.
My answer was a few above yours, Andy. You’re raking over old coals. I know you and Naomi are at daggers with each other and she’s a slippery, evasive, obfuscating person but what’s your aim?
I think some of you take the site all too serious.

Angry words will never solve problems.

Zacs - // My answer was a few above yours, Andy. You’re raking over old coals. I know you and Naomi are at daggers with each other and she’s a slippery, evasive, obfuscating person but what’s your aim? //

No aim at all - just an observation.

Nothing more than that.
OK - let's park yesterday, which did get out of hand on all sides.

Retrocop - I am not trying to pick an argument at all, I am genuinely interested to know if you wish to discuss with me -

Your apparent view that civil disobedience in the form of assault by members of the public on each other is acceptable if the provocation is sufficient - balanced against your career as a police officer where an assault is an arrestable offence.

If you wish to respond, we can discuss, if not, no harm done.

Over to you.
‘Nothing more than that’

Pah! It’s much more than that. It’s about you settling some weird score with Naomi. It seems to be becoming an obsession and I seriously don’t think it’s doing your mental health any good.
Zacs - // ‘Nothing more than that’

Pah! It’s much more than that. It’s about you settling some weird score with Naomi. It seems to be becoming an obsession and I seriously don’t think it’s doing your mental health any good. //

I seriously don't care what you think about my imagined 'score', or my mental health, which is absolutely none of your business.

Sleep well.
Bizarre
I’m still here …
Bless
Retrocop - I am not trying to pick an argument at all, I am genuinely interested to know if you wish to discuss with me -

Your apparent view that civil disobedience in the form of assault by members of the public on each other is acceptable if the provocation is sufficient - balanced against your career as a police officer where an assault is an arrestable offence.

If you wish to respond, we can discuss, if not, no harm done.

Over to you.

Any response?
Retro has not posted here since Friday afternoon, no one else has since late Saturday. Now this taunt appears. You are ill Mr Hughes and this is not a voluntary care in the community programme.

141 to 160 of 167rss feed

First Previous 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

This Is How You Do It.........

Answer Question >>