Travel0 min ago
Immigration
It looks like at least one political leader is reading my posts on here – that migrants are absolutely essential to our economy (public services, businesses etc); with an aging population and low fertility rates - it is the only realistic policy if we are not to have our public services/business suffering drastic decline through a lack of workers.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I was impressed with Stephen Flynn. He got more applause than the other leaders and he talked a lot of commonsense. I am unable to vote for his party, but I am slightly reassured if coalitions are to be made in the event of a hung parliament, that their is someone in the SNP in Westminster worth talking to.
Emigrants are generally people that we need, like teachers and doctors. They want to live in a better place than Britain (in their mind). Why do they think that?
Then, people in their fifties are retiring or semi-retiring.
And older people are getting older and needing/wanting more care before dying. Which means a bigger and bigger swing in the balance between workers and non-workers, as well as the balance between the work we need and the workers we actually have.
And many younger people feel like they've been swizzed - jobs that don't pay enough, tuition loans still hanging over them, mortgages being unaffordable. So many of those that aren't in a position to emigrate feel disaffected.
And until all of that is sorted out, we need immigrants ...
ynnafymmi,
Aberdeen South might be an interesting seat to watch.
SNP Stephen Flynn 20,388
Conservative Douglas Lumsden 16,398
Liberal Democrats Ian Yuill 5,018
Labour Shona Simpson 3,834
A 4,000 majority. SNP and Conservatives will probably both lose votes, but I don't think the LibDems or Labour can close the gap enough. One to look out for though.
Also Corby as you ask me;
https:/
We have plenty of potential workers, a reduced population is a necessity not a problem. Ideally we require negative immigration not positive.
Anyone who can grasp the concept of not being able to get a quart into a pint bottle, will intuitively understand why we can't go on expanding forever and to do so must create a more intense problem for future generations; even if they fail to see the issues already evident in the present due to lack of migrant management from every government we've had.