Bliss Roots Cbd Gummies"Where To...
Food & Drink1 min ago
Just been reading
29 Answers
About the people who put bleach and urine in the emergency water supply. Why are these people allowed to live, they also drained the supply in one area. The reason is because our country is run by lilly livered lefty bum holes, like most of the people in this place... these people will always be around to destroy our country, they attack firemen and ambulance crews, so it is people like you who are at faught for letting it happen. Stand them against a wall and shoot the **********************************************************************************************. If you disagree with shooting them, you are part of the problem and need to be wiped out as well.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by reachesme. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Oh no, i didn't spell something wrong, boo hoo.
So you think the way we treat these scum bags is correct. ASBO's are brillient arn't they, they work? I am sick of the nappy state we live in and i am sick of limp wristed morons who don't want to upset anyone. Sod em, round up the scum and shoot them. Now come back with an argument that dosn't revolve around my education, spelling incorrectly is not a crime and you only use it because it frightens anyone who isn't an English teacher from answering. Now what do you think should be done, maybe we should send them all on holiday and they will all turn good. They are pathetic and so are the people who seem to protect them.
So you think the way we treat these scum bags is correct. ASBO's are brillient arn't they, they work? I am sick of the nappy state we live in and i am sick of limp wristed morons who don't want to upset anyone. Sod em, round up the scum and shoot them. Now come back with an argument that dosn't revolve around my education, spelling incorrectly is not a crime and you only use it because it frightens anyone who isn't an English teacher from answering. Now what do you think should be done, maybe we should send them all on holiday and they will all turn good. They are pathetic and so are the people who seem to protect them.
So you think the way we treat these scum bags is correct.
Can't see that anywhere in either my post or Waldo McFroog's.
maybe we should send them all on holiday and they will all turn good
Nope. Can't see that either. Of course these lowlives need to be caught, and of course they need to be punished properly, but as far as I can remember, the Tories didn't allow the random shooting of people either. Not even under Thatcher.
BTW, don't feel do bad about your education. Anyone who knows an expletive that takes up that many asterisks must have learnt something.
Can't see that anywhere in either my post or Waldo McFroog's.
maybe we should send them all on holiday and they will all turn good
Nope. Can't see that either. Of course these lowlives need to be caught, and of course they need to be punished properly, but as far as I can remember, the Tories didn't allow the random shooting of people either. Not even under Thatcher.
BTW, don't feel do bad about your education. Anyone who knows an expletive that takes up that many asterisks must have learnt something.
rofl, along with LOM I was also trying to think of a swear word that was that long, alas being the good Boo I am I couldn't think of any.
Anyhoos, back to the point you raised, yes, it's despicable what these people are doing, but I have to go along with the general opinion that maybe shooting them is a bit harsh?
How about we sit them down and make them answer cold callers all day long on the phone? Several hours of "I'm conducting a survey in your area......" and loft insulation grants offered from "peter" in Bangladesh who can't even say their name correctly is bound to send them doolally, as I know they have me!
Anyhoos, back to the point you raised, yes, it's despicable what these people are doing, but I have to go along with the general opinion that maybe shooting them is a bit harsh?
How about we sit them down and make them answer cold callers all day long on the phone? Several hours of "I'm conducting a survey in your area......" and loft insulation grants offered from "peter" in Bangladesh who can't even say their name correctly is bound to send them doolally, as I know they have me!
Come on then looney lefties, tell us all how it's done, maybe we should buy them all a PS3, with two games and an extra control pad of coarse. So please do tell Mr jellyfish, you have the answer, no backbone but the answer, share with us all, so we can live and spell correctly and let people take us up the backside and love it.
It is faintly possible that if you put together a decent argument that isn't just a hysterical kneejerk over-reaction, you might get a decent response. As it is, you're making Richard Littlejohn look like a major philosopher.
It's frankly amusing that you have attempted to imply if someone doesn't support the death penalty for yobbery then they must necessarily support said yobbery. Not a terribly sophisticated argument, nor a sound one.
Incidentally, what's a 'nappy state'?
It's frankly amusing that you have attempted to imply if someone doesn't support the death penalty for yobbery then they must necessarily support said yobbery. Not a terribly sophisticated argument, nor a sound one.
Incidentally, what's a 'nappy state'?
OK, I'm about to give a sensible answer. I may very well need a lie down after this.
Firstly, sorry about the spelling jibe. Not something I normally do (except when someone makes a howler while snottily correcting someone else, I reckon that's fair game). I must admit I do find it annoying when someone else does it, so I apologise.
As for dealing with the problem, I always feel that any crime which endangers the lives or health of people should be punished by a proper sentence in a proper prison (not a cushy, open one). Bearing in mind the overcrowding problem, many people are in jail for relatively small, purely monetary crimes where no-one has been threatened (please note I am certainly NOT talking about things like armed robbery). There should be more financial and fewer custodial punishments for these people, thus freeing up jail space for those who would happily hurt others.
Firstly, sorry about the spelling jibe. Not something I normally do (except when someone makes a howler while snottily correcting someone else, I reckon that's fair game). I must admit I do find it annoying when someone else does it, so I apologise.
As for dealing with the problem, I always feel that any crime which endangers the lives or health of people should be punished by a proper sentence in a proper prison (not a cushy, open one). Bearing in mind the overcrowding problem, many people are in jail for relatively small, purely monetary crimes where no-one has been threatened (please note I am certainly NOT talking about things like armed robbery). There should be more financial and fewer custodial punishments for these people, thus freeing up jail space for those who would happily hurt others.
Where exactly were you reading this reaches me?
The Sun by any chance?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2007340687, 00.html
Reading the article it seems that the journalist knows all this because locals told him so!
Maybe it's true, maybe it's gossip but Is this the level of proof in your brave new world.
Stand them up against a wall 'cause I read it in the Sun?
The Sun by any chance?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2007340687, 00.html
Reading the article it seems that the journalist knows all this because locals told him so!
Maybe it's true, maybe it's gossip but Is this the level of proof in your brave new world.
Stand them up against a wall 'cause I read it in the Sun?
