It is possible to believe or not in whatever you choose. Belief does not in itself create, alter, nor dispense with reality. But the refusal to accept reality for what it is endangers the believer and those affected by their actions by how those actions effect and ultimately play out in reality. Because of the real consequences of actions it is an individuals responsibility to determine whether the beliefs that guide their choices and actions correspond to reality.
In order to make a determination as to whether god (or anything else) exists or not one must first define the nature of what it is they are considering the existence of. Only after stipulating the nature of a supposition is it possible to determine or offer proof of whether or not something exists.
The belief in the existence of god is shown to be rationally absurd by either demonstrating that a proposed definition of god contradicts something we do know about reality, (for instance something, anything, can not both be and not be at the same time), or by equating �God� with something else, �God is reality�, in which case �God� is nothing more than a redundancy, adding a useless new term to an already sufficient vocabulary.
To simply state that �God exists� or �God does not exist� is a meaningless non-assertion. You might as well say, �Nothing exists�, and thereby relay no less information about what it is you are attempting to assert.
cont~