Body & Soul1 min ago
Morality - what would you do?
39 Answers
Here's the situation:
It's war time, and you're hiding in a basement with a group of other people. Enemy soldiers are approaching outside and will be drawn to any sound. If you're found, you'll all be killed immediately.
A baby hiding with you starts to cry loudly and cannot be stopped. Smothering it to death is the only way to silence it, saving the lives of everyone in the room. Assume that the parents of the baby are unknown and not present and there will be no penalty for killing the child.
Could you be the one who smothered it if no one else would?
It's war time, and you're hiding in a basement with a group of other people. Enemy soldiers are approaching outside and will be drawn to any sound. If you're found, you'll all be killed immediately.
A baby hiding with you starts to cry loudly and cannot be stopped. Smothering it to death is the only way to silence it, saving the lives of everyone in the room. Assume that the parents of the baby are unknown and not present and there will be no penalty for killing the child.
Could you be the one who smothered it if no one else would?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Lakitu. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
There was a question sometime back on here, which presented a similar moral/immoral dilemma � something about a runaway tram or suchlike.
Is it for you to decide that the baby dies and the rest live?
Is it for you to decide that the baby lives and the rest die?
Is it for you to decide who decides, and who does the ultimate killing/let live decision?
There are no right/wrong answers, society will judge you as both moral and immoral whichever you chose.
Is it for you to decide that the baby dies and the rest live?
Is it for you to decide that the baby lives and the rest die?
Is it for you to decide who decides, and who does the ultimate killing/let live decision?
There are no right/wrong answers, society will judge you as both moral and immoral whichever you chose.
The overwhelming majority of people, faced with a hypothetical situation like this will apparently indicate that an act of ommission is less bad than an act of commission - that is, to let everyone die by not killing the baby would be considered more morally acceptable than killing the baby to save everyone.
Sociopaths will kill the baby, and interestingly, brainscans clearly show that they use different areas of the brain to make their decisions.
Sociopaths will kill the baby, and interestingly, brainscans clearly show that they use different areas of the brain to make their decisions.
Just by imagining that the enemy soldiers would come and kill all of us would not make me kill a baby. That would be a murder. I would rather wait for the last moment and see.
Soldiers may never hear baby.
Something else may change the course of action of the soldiers outside and they go away.
Soldiers may just arrest all of us and later everyone could survive.
I would rather fight the soldiers if I have to and try to save the others instead of killing an innocent.
Soldiers may never hear baby.
Something else may change the course of action of the soldiers outside and they go away.
Soldiers may just arrest all of us and later everyone could survive.
I would rather fight the soldiers if I have to and try to save the others instead of killing an innocent.