So Lets Shaft Our Farmers.....
News6 mins ago
Do you think you can cheat God?
83 Answers
Pascal’s Wager, in short, states that:
**a man has everything to gain and nothing to lose by believing in God, and everything to lose and nothing to gain by not believing in God. On these grounds, one would be foolish not to believe.** (**-** Copied from the internet).
So, according to that, Pascal’s faith wasn’t genuine – but more importantly, he rather stupidly overlooked the fact that God is, allegedly, omniscient, and would therefore be aware of this devious ploy.
Many of the religious here appear to have no hesitation in trumpeting their piety and their good deeds, whilst at the same time often vilifying their fellow man, and in particular those who don’t believe as the religious claim to. In my understanding of Christianity, all of that seems rather contrary to Christ’s teachings. However, it now appears that one self-proclaimed Christian here is, in fact, taking the path of Pascal’s Wager, and I wonder just how many others are secretly following suit– and if so, if it transpires that God does indeed exist, do they really think they are capable of cheating him?
**a man has everything to gain and nothing to lose by believing in God, and everything to lose and nothing to gain by not believing in God. On these grounds, one would be foolish not to believe.** (**-** Copied from the internet).
So, according to that, Pascal’s faith wasn’t genuine – but more importantly, he rather stupidly overlooked the fact that God is, allegedly, omniscient, and would therefore be aware of this devious ploy.
Many of the religious here appear to have no hesitation in trumpeting their piety and their good deeds, whilst at the same time often vilifying their fellow man, and in particular those who don’t believe as the religious claim to. In my understanding of Christianity, all of that seems rather contrary to Christ’s teachings. However, it now appears that one self-proclaimed Christian here is, in fact, taking the path of Pascal’s Wager, and I wonder just how many others are secretly following suit– and if so, if it transpires that God does indeed exist, do they really think they are capable of cheating him?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think that people's logical and analytical abilities vary so widely that what seems a perfectly straightforward and convincing argument to one of them will look like incomprehensible nonsense or self-deluding rubbish to another one; and in anything related to religion, it's even more so.
So there's isn't the slightest chance of getting anything like a consensus of opinion on this item, but that won't stop lots of people trying.
So there's isn't the slightest chance of getting anything like a consensus of opinion on this item, but that won't stop lots of people trying.
Pascal's wager is typical of a lot of philosophical arguments, it is too glib and doesn't address the little matter of probability. In real terms it is completely fallacious as it ignores the very real downside of belief in god whilst giving too much weight to the the unfeasibly remote possibility that such a thing as god exists. I have never considered it worthy of anything other than the most cursory consideration.
Then there's the problem of determining which witch is the real witch, going on the assumption that any one of the choices standing in the line up is indeed the 'actual' suspect, a possibility I've already ruled out by the alleged nature of the candidates presented to date . . . but that's another topic.
//However, it now appears that one self-proclaimed Christian here is, in fact, taking the path of Pascal’s Wager, and I wonder just how many others are secretly following suit//
Naomi, I don't know who you refer to in the first part of that sentence, and only those you refer to in the latter can, or will answer honestly.
Imo, Pascal's Wager is a theoretical, actuarial luxury only available to those with the time and security to invent it, never mind seriously exercise or debate it, why ever they do.
Recent exposure to the -admittedly /specialist/ - brothels in Mumbai providing 8-10 year old Nepali girls indentured as prostitutes by utterly impoverished families leaves me with questions this question really doesn't touch.
Naomi, I don't know who you refer to in the first part of that sentence, and only those you refer to in the latter can, or will answer honestly.
Imo, Pascal's Wager is a theoretical, actuarial luxury only available to those with the time and security to invent it, never mind seriously exercise or debate it, why ever they do.
Recent exposure to the -admittedly /specialist/ - brothels in Mumbai providing 8-10 year old Nepali girls indentured as prostitutes by utterly impoverished families leaves me with questions this question really doesn't touch.
Seems more of a potential legitimate reason for the choice than a devious ploy to me. Surely a diety would be content with whatever convinces you to choose 'the right path'. Anyway it's not what you believe so much, it's what you are. Actions speak much louder than words. And 'roads to hell' aside, intent must surely be important too.
Zac, //For Gods sake give it a rest.//
This is R&S. If the topics here don't suit you, go elsewhere. No one is obliged to contribute.
Humbersloop, //Recent exposure to the -admittedly /specialist/ - brothels in Mumbai providing 8-10 year old Nepali girls indentured as prostitutes by utterly impoverished families leaves me with questions this question really doesn't touch.//
This question isn't intended to touch, or to address, the issue you mention, and therefore I can only suggest you ask the questions that you would rather seek answers to. I, for one, would be interested in any discussion arising from them.
This is R&S. If the topics here don't suit you, go elsewhere. No one is obliged to contribute.
Humbersloop, //Recent exposure to the -admittedly /specialist/ - brothels in Mumbai providing 8-10 year old Nepali girls indentured as prostitutes by utterly impoverished families leaves me with questions this question really doesn't touch.//
This question isn't intended to touch, or to address, the issue you mention, and therefore I can only suggest you ask the questions that you would rather seek answers to. I, for one, would be interested in any discussion arising from them.
I see it as a kind of missionary work. Trying to save you from yourself, if you like. It's good to have a hobby and be passionate about something but there's a fine line between passion and obsession, and I think you're in danger of crossing it. I hope this doesn't come across as patronising but I have seen people, both friends and relatives who's passion has made them blinkered to the fact that life was hurtling past them and before they realised, it was too late.
