Quizzes & Puzzles45 mins ago
Does It Make You Happy To Mock God?
90 Answers
Gal:6v7
Answers
goodlife - I do wish you would stop these posts. I've read a lot of them and ignored them. All you are doing is stirring up feeling against the quiet believers amongst us, who would not dream of lecturing anyone else about their beliefs, but occasionally post with a valid, religious background. Please desist.
20:57 Tue 08th Sep 2015
// God’s moral laws are eternal and unchangeable. For this reason the principle found at Galatians 6:7 applies today.//
erm well they arent are they ?
stoning adulteresses springs to mind .. let him who is without sin etc
and so with a little thought easy to see that Christ was changing the eternal law ( ergo it wasnt eternal ) - and this was called the new covenant
and for chrissakes there is a book called Deuteronomy - the second law... in short if it were unchanged, you wouldnt need one would you - you sould just say - re-read the first law - it hasnt changed since wednesday ....
throwing the money changers out of the Temple,
the good samaritan - helping instead of walking on by.....
I mean Christ was always changing things - no wonder they crucified him
erm well they arent are they ?
stoning adulteresses springs to mind .. let him who is without sin etc
and so with a little thought easy to see that Christ was changing the eternal law ( ergo it wasnt eternal ) - and this was called the new covenant
and for chrissakes there is a book called Deuteronomy - the second law... in short if it were unchanged, you wouldnt need one would you - you sould just say - re-read the first law - it hasnt changed since wednesday ....
throwing the money changers out of the Temple,
the good samaritan - helping instead of walking on by.....
I mean Christ was always changing things - no wonder they crucified him
// But just because someone 'famous' suddenly believes in God does not affirm God's existence - any more than a famous cleric suddenly becoming an atheist proves that he does not//.
no but ( or yes but ) a famous cleric being eaten by a lion proves that lions exist ?
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Harol d_David son
no but ( or yes but ) a famous cleric being eaten by a lion proves that lions exist ?
https:/
How refreshing to read the post from Clanad. He actually knew Anthony Loop and has provided a lot of information about him and his beliefs. More helpful than the 'Antony Flew is a loop' comment.
And Naomi you have also addressed to me -
"The real flaw in Grasscarp's reasoning is not necessarily that there is a possibility that a creator exists but that its identity is known. "
I was linking to a website that gives some reasons, put down more succinctly then I could have done, pointing to there being a creator, and specifically for people who don't want to believe anything written in the bible....
And I said nothing about "its identity" so don't understand what point you are trying to make.
And Naomi you have also addressed to me -
"The real flaw in Grasscarp's reasoning is not necessarily that there is a possibility that a creator exists but that its identity is known. "
I was linking to a website that gives some reasons, put down more succinctly then I could have done, pointing to there being a creator, and specifically for people who don't want to believe anything written in the bible....
And I said nothing about "its identity" so don't understand what point you are trying to make.
Grasscarp,// I said nothing about "its identity" so don't understand what point you are trying to make. //
You said …
//It also mentions some famous former atheists who have changed their minds about existence of God.//
You didn’t say ‘a God’ – you said ‘God’ so one could be forgiven for thinking you meant a specific God. If not, which God were you talking about?
I regret that you found my comment about Antony FLEW (his name is not Loop) unhelpful, but his work is far too tedious – not to say bizarre - for me to bother to elaborate upon here. Perhaps you should read some of it yourself and make your own mind up.
Incidentally, I didn’t get the impression from Clanad’s post that he knew Antony Flew personally – rather that Clanad was quoting someone who did - David S. Oderberg.
You said …
//It also mentions some famous former atheists who have changed their minds about existence of God.//
You didn’t say ‘a God’ – you said ‘God’ so one could be forgiven for thinking you meant a specific God. If not, which God were you talking about?
I regret that you found my comment about Antony FLEW (his name is not Loop) unhelpful, but his work is far too tedious – not to say bizarre - for me to bother to elaborate upon here. Perhaps you should read some of it yourself and make your own mind up.
Incidentally, I didn’t get the impression from Clanad’s post that he knew Antony Flew personally – rather that Clanad was quoting someone who did - David S. Oderberg.
Back to the mocking or ridiculers.
We should remember, however, that while God has the power to punish those, and has often done so—he is by no means bloodthirsty or cruel. He is really a God of love. (1 John 4:8)
The apostle Peter said: You know this first, that in the last days there will come ridiculers with their ridicule, proceeding according to their own desires and saying: ‘Where is this promised presence of his? Why, from the day our forefathers fell asleep in death, all things are continuing exactly as from creation’s beginning.’”—2 Peter 3:3, 4.
Ridiculers are in general detestable to others.
We should remember, however, that while God has the power to punish those, and has often done so—he is by no means bloodthirsty or cruel. He is really a God of love. (1 John 4:8)
The apostle Peter said: You know this first, that in the last days there will come ridiculers with their ridicule, proceeding according to their own desires and saying: ‘Where is this promised presence of his? Why, from the day our forefathers fell asleep in death, all things are continuing exactly as from creation’s beginning.’”—2 Peter 3:3, 4.
Ridiculers are in general detestable to others.
Goodlife, //Ridiculers are in general detestable to others.//
According to you everyone who isn’t a Jehovah’s Witness is pretty detestable. As you said yourself “Foolish are those professed Christians who would serve God and Christ and who would at the same time be friends of the world!” Just as well most of the people here don’t take your opinions seriously. Your unkindness could be rather hurtful to the more sensitive soul. ;o)
According to you everyone who isn’t a Jehovah’s Witness is pretty detestable. As you said yourself “Foolish are those professed Christians who would serve God and Christ and who would at the same time be friends of the world!” Just as well most of the people here don’t take your opinions seriously. Your unkindness could be rather hurtful to the more sensitive soul. ;o)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.