Is Saving £21000 Per Year Good
Family & Relationships0 min ago
Can Islam Be Reformed?
76 Answers
Somali-born ex-Muslim writer and politician, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who worked with murdered film director Theo van Gogh, said in an interview with Britain's Channel 4 News that Islam must be reformed to save it from extremists. //Schools and mosques must stop "taking young children, boys and girls, and filling their heads, using the Quran and the example of the Prophet Mohammed, filling their heads with hatred for this life, filling their heads with the idea of jihad, with the idea of Sharia."//
That will mean rejection of sections of the Koran and of the Prophet Mohammed’s perceived infallibility – but both are unthinkable to Muslims. What hope?
That will mean rejection of sections of the Koran and of the Prophet Mohammed’s perceived infallibility – but both are unthinkable to Muslims. What hope?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Sorry, forgot the link.
http://
http://
In my inexpert opinion, since there are presenly extremists who take all recorded teaching literally and with the worst interpretation, and more reasonable moderates who apply sense to ancient teachings, a schism has already occurred in practice, and reformation achieved. The issue is whether the violent part will ever behave in a decent manner; and this is unlikely as parents (or others) corrupt the minds of the next generation.
You probably have to judge it by the model of christianity whose followers were equally barbaric 500+ years ago in the name of their religion. It's evolved and continues to evolve into something relatively non-violent despite all the violence and intolerance being promoted in the bible as a whole.
The words in the book can't change of course. Whole sections just get convieniently ignored, and others reinterpreted by the relevant scholars so maintain some relevance to modern civilisation.
Islam will eventually evolve in the same way, but the bad news is it's a good few hundred years behind christianity and will need to be dragged kicking and screaming out of its medieval mindset.
The words in the book can't change of course. Whole sections just get convieniently ignored, and others reinterpreted by the relevant scholars so maintain some relevance to modern civilisation.
Islam will eventually evolve in the same way, but the bad news is it's a good few hundred years behind christianity and will need to be dragged kicking and screaming out of its medieval mindset.
'Can their book be interpreted differently?' would be more apt.
And of course it could as per the example Ludwig gives with the Christians.
Wahabbism, and especially how the Saudi's have exported it since the end of WW 2 when the House of Saud became the inheritors of untold billions of petrodollars (under the guidance and watch of the Americans) is a fact many on here seem incapable of comprehending , but until that inconvenient fact is DEALT with the Daesh/al-Quaeda/Islam associated terrorismwill NEVER cease.
"Yet although IS is certainly an Islamic movement, it is neither typical nor mired in the distant past, because its roots are in Wahhabism, a form of Islam practised in Saudi Arabia that developed only in the 18th century."
http://
"Exact numbers are not known, but it is thought that more than $100 billion have been spent on exporting fanatical Wahhabism to various much poorer Muslim nations worldwide over the past three decades. It might well be twice that number. By comparison, the Soviets spent about $7 billion spreading communism worldwide in the 70 years from 1921 and 1991."
http://
And of course it could as per the example Ludwig gives with the Christians.
Wahabbism, and especially how the Saudi's have exported it since the end of WW 2 when the House of Saud became the inheritors of untold billions of petrodollars (under the guidance and watch of the Americans) is a fact many on here seem incapable of comprehending , but until that inconvenient fact is DEALT with the Daesh/al-Quaeda/Islam associated terrorismwill NEVER cease.
"Yet although IS is certainly an Islamic movement, it is neither typical nor mired in the distant past, because its roots are in Wahhabism, a form of Islam practised in Saudi Arabia that developed only in the 18th century."
http://
"Exact numbers are not known, but it is thought that more than $100 billion have been spent on exporting fanatical Wahhabism to various much poorer Muslim nations worldwide over the past three decades. It might well be twice that number. By comparison, the Soviets spent about $7 billion spreading communism worldwide in the 70 years from 1921 and 1991."
http://
Ludwig is correct. As within Christianity, a reformation is highly likely to take place and arguably is already under way as is evident through large numbers of Muslims taking a pragmatic approach to the letter of the book. Again as in the Christian sphere, fundamentalist are always likely to exist and they will manifest their particular versions in the Islamic equivalents of Christian cults, some in remote places until they fizzle out (as with Guyana where they drank from a vat of poison) or in eccentric groups among and in close contact with the rest of society (Amish, JW, Scientology, Latter Day Saints, etc.). Each will take their own position on "the Word" and insist their view is correct and everybody else's is wrong. To this extent there is no difference among the various religions. It will take the Muslim world some time to go through the process and, given modern communications, travel, etc., the rest of the world has become and will remain involved for some time to come. It is my belief that, whereas the process took Christianity some centuries to complete, Islam will from now reach a similar "steady state" in about the sort of time it took Communism to go through its lifespan from the Marx-Engels ideas to date (less than one and a half centuries).
Islam has already been reformed. ISIS was created and is being helped by that reformed Islam by Americans and most of the West.
However I will ask this writer and you a couple of questions.
Why all of a sudden West needs a reformed Islam when they have started seeing by product of what they cultivated to destroy a few other countries? Why Islam did not need reformation when Americans were recruiting people from all over the world in the name of Jihad, were giving them weapons, training and were pushing them into Afghanistan to fight against Russia?
Why when those same people, with same weapons and same training are fighting against America then they have become terrorists?
Do you have any answer?
Still there is time that America and a few other countries should stop their dreams of controlling the world at any cost. Otherwise unfortunately when you set fire to someone else’s house then sooner or later flames will engulf your own house. And that’s a fact.
However I will ask this writer and you a couple of questions.
Why all of a sudden West needs a reformed Islam when they have started seeing by product of what they cultivated to destroy a few other countries? Why Islam did not need reformation when Americans were recruiting people from all over the world in the name of Jihad, were giving them weapons, training and were pushing them into Afghanistan to fight against Russia?
Why when those same people, with same weapons and same training are fighting against America then they have become terrorists?
Do you have any answer?
Still there is time that America and a few other countries should stop their dreams of controlling the world at any cost. Otherwise unfortunately when you set fire to someone else’s house then sooner or later flames will engulf your own house. And that’s a fact.
I think one may be mixing reasons for conflict as if they were the same. They are only the same with respect to needing to negate whatever is seen as the biggest threat at the time. But this thread is specifically about the possibility of reforming a religion that presently seems, in part, to be out of rational control and threatening to make a large section of the world a living hell for the people there, and a continuous threat to neighbours and further. It's not about the political ideology of communist Russia and how that was opposed.
Keyplus, I don't go with your conspiracy theories but if you want to question the writer you can contact her here.
http://
http://
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.