ChatterBank4 mins ago
The Mail Says We Should Give Sanctuary To Calais Camps Children, Do You Agree?
70 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/d ebate/a rticle- 3562690 /DAILY- MAIL-CO MMENT-M ail-s-r obust-m igratio n-lost- childre n-sanct uary.ht ml
/// Mr Cameron should consider that of all the countries in the Europe, Britain has the longest established tradition of offering sanctuary to refugees from war and oppression. ///
Yes but these have been fellow Europeans, and why have we been able to that? It is the fact that we have in the past fought and died to defend our lands, so as to keep our country free from invasion.
Why should we give up all this now?
/// Mr Cameron should consider that of all the countries in the Europe, Britain has the longest established tradition of offering sanctuary to refugees from war and oppression. ///
Yes but these have been fellow Europeans, and why have we been able to that? It is the fact that we have in the past fought and died to defend our lands, so as to keep our country free from invasion.
Why should we give up all this now?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Any so called 'orphan' aged 5-6 yrs who can find their way half across the world without sponsors, papers and money, parents or relatives are potential rocket scientists by 10 yrs so perhaps they should be given consideration before the Soviets or the U.S. realise their potential. Have the smugglers got charitable hearts after all?
This is a very tough question.
I think when you sit at a distance from it, it's easy to be hard-hearted.
But if you were a visitor to those refugee camps, walking among those children, talking to them ... it would be very difficult to refuse them help.
The provisos recommended by the DM seem reasonable. For example, it should be an aim mostly met to repatriate the children with their parents, rather than the other way around.
I think when you sit at a distance from it, it's easy to be hard-hearted.
But if you were a visitor to those refugee camps, walking among those children, talking to them ... it would be very difficult to refuse them help.
The provisos recommended by the DM seem reasonable. For example, it should be an aim mostly met to repatriate the children with their parents, rather than the other way around.
How many has France already taken? How many has Britain already taken?
You, as the DM puts it, "should consider that of all the countries in the Europe, Britain has the longest established tradition of offering sanctuary to refugees from war and oppression."
For example, have a read of this:
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Kinde rtransp ort
Then imagine how that would read had we done literally nothing then, which is what appears to be the alternative now.
You, as the DM puts it, "should consider that of all the countries in the Europe, Britain has the longest established tradition of offering sanctuary to refugees from war and oppression."
For example, have a read of this:
https:/
Then imagine how that would read had we done literally nothing then, which is what appears to be the alternative now.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.