ChatterBank2 mins ago
For Nailit
23 Answers
https:/ /youtu. be/vl80 2lHAk5Y
Hi Nailit. Before anybody gets upset for me posting poet another video, let me state now that this is for YOU Nailit, although all welcome to view it of course.
Regarding previous posts, " kinds," equals, "phyla."
Hope this helps.
Hi Nailit. Before anybody gets upset for me posting poet another video, let me state now that this is for YOU Nailit, although all welcome to view it of course.
Regarding previous posts, " kinds," equals, "phyla."
Hope this helps.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ. no - phyla may well mean "tribes" in the OT
but in biology is a term in classification ( zoological taxonomy ) and dates really in this from 1755 ( linnaeus and all that )
I thought kinds might be genera but THAT also has a specific scientific meaning from Linnaeus again
Using words with a modern meaning in the old context is like saying
" Jesus when he tied his ass to tree and went into Jerusalem phoned ahead on his mobie and ordered a burger at the al-quds macdonalds because he wasnt sure what he was going to eat that night if anything"
( and we kinda know he didnt)
but in biology is a term in classification ( zoological taxonomy ) and dates really in this from 1755 ( linnaeus and all that )
I thought kinds might be genera but THAT also has a specific scientific meaning from Linnaeus again
Using words with a modern meaning in the old context is like saying
" Jesus when he tied his ass to tree and went into Jerusalem phoned ahead on his mobie and ordered a burger at the al-quds macdonalds because he wasnt sure what he was going to eat that night if anything"
( and we kinda know he didnt)
Thanks for that Theland, its a one and a half hour vid so will try to watch it when I get a little 'down' time. Always like to try and see both sides of the coin. As I said on my thread in science, Ive always had my problems with evolution (one species turning into another) but even if evolution doesn't convince me of mankind's origin, the Bible doesn't either. (I simply cannot believe in a dirt man and a rib woman living in an enchanted garden with magical 'knowledge' trees and talking snakes and sinful apples)
Thanks for the vid anyway :-)
Thanks for the vid anyway :-)
Peter P - I have always tried to keep an open mind. Yes it is true that you can ride a coach and horses through the evidence for my beliefs, if you don't look below the surface and delve into the nitty gritty of not only the science, but the philosophical foundations of our various viewpoints.
Your comments which verge on the edge of ridicule and mockery, whilst most welcome for the contribution, and something else for me to consider, are devoid of any plausible explanation to support evolution, and counter the arguments put forward by Stephen Meyer.
But thank you anyway.
Your comments which verge on the edge of ridicule and mockery, whilst most welcome for the contribution, and something else for me to consider, are devoid of any plausible explanation to support evolution, and counter the arguments put forward by Stephen Meyer.
But thank you anyway.
To be serious once again.
Just ONE issue.
The origin of information.
DNA coded A, C, T, and G, is far advanced of the binary code that is used in our computers.
Binary has simply "plus," or "minus" or 1 or 2.
Biology is so far advanced beyond that.
I can't explain it all I'm a paragraph or two, but it is a field well worth examination.
I have spent time investigating this, and it really does underpin my beliefs and expose atheism as, " The Emperors New Clothes,"
Just ONE issue.
The origin of information.
DNA coded A, C, T, and G, is far advanced of the binary code that is used in our computers.
Binary has simply "plus," or "minus" or 1 or 2.
Biology is so far advanced beyond that.
I can't explain it all I'm a paragraph or two, but it is a field well worth examination.
I have spent time investigating this, and it really does underpin my beliefs and expose atheism as, " The Emperors New Clothes,"
//Is there something wrong with been naked in ones own home?
Just a thought!
I like been as nature intended......//
Nailit
Just so you know, those two occurrences of "been" in your post quoted above should be "being". So your post should be:
Is there something wrong with being naked in ones own home?
Just a thought!
I like being as nature intended......
Just a thought!
I like been as nature intended......//
Nailit
Just so you know, those two occurrences of "been" in your post quoted above should be "being". So your post should be:
Is there something wrong with being naked in ones own home?
Just a thought!
I like being as nature intended......