No. Keep it R & S. But there is nothing wrong using the available expertise to back up our theories.
But one or two ABers are very dismissive of this, but they don't have to watch the videos do they?
And there is a very smart Guy (and a good One) who has "created" a world in which some of the creatures He's created toothache,cancer, and
other less than pleasant things.
If the world I see is created by Theland's Him (who's a good guy) I don't buy into the Theland "Him" who's totally incompetent given that world as I see it. Nor can I explain the contradictions implicit in the belief that an omnipotent Deity would allow a cat to be run over by a car and die in pain behind my shed..
//And there is a very smart Guy (and a good One) who has "created" a world in which some of the creatures He's created toothache,cancer, and
other less than pleasant things.//
Who is he?
If he's well known I can find out I'm sure, but it's late - I understand if you'd rather not tell me.
I can see where some might buy the argument that we're (the human race) being punished for some kind of indiscretion against an alleged creator . . . but what tree did the cat eat thereof is what I can't follow.
This thread is a shot at an explanation. Obvious incomplete but in my view not entirely nonsensical either. But feel free, (if not encouraged), to criticise all the same.
If a creator got it so wrong, submit an improved design that doesn't need constant adjustment and tweaking, but which works by itself.
I may look at the video later, although they should only be used to back up an argument made here. I suspect the physical necessities and indications to provide a body with consciousness may have a physical pattern, but it doesn't necessarily follow that, that is all there is to it.