Technology4 mins ago
Atheism, Agnosticism, Belief.
260 Answers
Nine and a half minutes. Very interesting.
Presented by Dinesh D'Souza, featuring Neo de Grasses Tyson.
https:/ /youtu. be/jYi7 yHeKBEI
Presented by Dinesh D'Souza, featuring Neo de Grasses Tyson.
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.https:/ /www.np r.org/t emplate s/story /story. php?sto ryId=12 260255& amp;t=1 6140169 83230
This one is still under scientific investigation.
This one is still under scientific investigation.
Cheeky wotsit. I've been saying it all day and only when mozz joined in, did you then do your own research. You are only showing us what we are telling you. Yes, we call them the same "family" because they can breed. That's why we do. But they can still make new and different species. It's taken this long to go round in a big circle right back to the start again lol.
Enjoy your dinner... :-)
Enjoy your dinner... :-)
Theland, //it [evolution] serves its purpose in denying creator God. //
But that isn't its purpose. You've made that up. You might be at war with science but science isn't at war with you. In fact it doesn't give you and your vivid imagination a second thought. It's far too busy seeking to verify reality.
But that isn't its purpose. You've made that up. You might be at war with science but science isn't at war with you. In fact it doesn't give you and your vivid imagination a second thought. It's far too busy seeking to verify reality.
It does, theland. That's why it's science and not faith. I know we will only go around in circles probably, but you are seeming to deliberately misunderstand that new species and new kinds, do happen. I have given you loads of examples, which show you can breed different enough types, that we classify them as a different kind... and more importantly, that they change over time.
Human evolution? Do you agree with it, or do you think earlier humans never existed/ were the same as us... ?
Human evolution? Do you agree with it, or do you think earlier humans never existed/ were the same as us... ?
Sorry, it's ligers, not tigrons which can carry cubs (the tigron cubs are too large for the female's womb, so result in stillborn cubs, they're not infertile though, as you claimed).
While liger males are infertile, the females most certainly are not.
https:/ /www.li gerworl d.com/l iliger. html
While liger males are infertile, the females most certainly are not.
https:/
Yes, mozz, mules are often sterile, but not always. Female ligers are usually fertile, while males aren't- probably as much as I know! But the point is, they can breed and breed, add in a panther, they can also breed with. And you can end up with an entirely new species.
The categories we use, are purely about whether animals can breed together or not- so saying they are part of the same family, is irrelevant, because that is how we chose to classify them in the first place.
I'm quite shocked tbh, that theland didn't seem to realise mules can breed- while clearly overriding scientists who do know.
The categories we use, are purely about whether animals can breed together or not- so saying they are part of the same family, is irrelevant, because that is how we chose to classify them in the first place.
I'm quite shocked tbh, that theland didn't seem to realise mules can breed- while clearly overriding scientists who do know.