Food & Drink1 min ago
I thought Religious don't force their views on other people?
248 Answers
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8586344.stm
I find this absolutely shocking!
No question just a bit of early morning venting!
I find this absolutely shocking!
No question just a bit of early morning venting!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sherminator. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Just to go slightly off thread for a moment, on the subject of pharmacies, has anyone else suffered from the same thing lately, whereby you go ino a Chemist's to buy some simple over-the counter product such as Paracetamol, laxatives &c, and are then subjected to the pharmacist's equivalent of the Spanish Inquisition, normally from a non-qualified counter assistant, who demands to know your symptoms, medical history, current medication &c.? I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that the simplest option is to lie and say that they are not for yourself but the old lady next door who has broken her leg and can't get to the shop. Shouldn't do it, I know, but it does tend to get on the proverbials.
I use the painkiller Solpadeine and have 2 every morning, which my doctor is aware of, to help me get started each day with my arthritis. Every time I go to the local chemist she says, is this for you, and have you had them before..........she knows me for god's sake but has to ask these questions to cover herself.
"It is absolutely wrong for anyone to impose their religious views on others" The pharmacists are not imposing their beliefs, they are merely saying that a particular belief prevents them from doing something. By saying "I am not willing to do X Y or Z because..." why is that forcing a particular belief on someone? They are not telling folk that what they want is wrong or immoral and demanding that the customer concede this fact they are explaining their personal position and as I understand it, explaining other sources available for the required product.
Thanks for the two previous responses. Interestingly enough, although this may be confined to my locality, the one place I am never questioned is Boot's, though I don't use them very often as over the years thay have gone from being the cheapest to the most expensive pharmacy.
Even more interesting, and perhaps relevant to the original thread, is that it is within my lifetime that Boot's started selling contraceptives. At one time they were taboo in that store, ostensibly for religious reasons.
Even more interesting, and perhaps relevant to the original thread, is that it is within my lifetime that Boot's started selling contraceptives. At one time they were taboo in that store, ostensibly for religious reasons.
If pharmacists can refuse to provide medication because of their own personal religious beliefs then we're on a very slippery slope indeed.
Presumably, those pharmacists who refuse to provide contraceptive medication do so because their religion says that it is not the right of any human being to decide who lives or dies – only God can make that choice.
But what is modern medicine if not direct human intervention which intends to defy the course of nature, and therefore God?
Before mankind invented/discovered such remarkable things as penicillin, antibiotics, x-rays, anti-retrovirals, etc., then people who were sick often died. When we talk about the number of deaths in third-world countries from easily curable illnesses, it is seen as a lamentable travesty that we have the means of intervention and yet do not provide it.
If the religious views of these particular pharmacists are taken to their logical conclusion, we might as well disband modern man-made medicines entirely as it is clearly interfering with God's will.
After all, who are we mere humans to decide who lives and who dies?
Presumably, those pharmacists who refuse to provide contraceptive medication do so because their religion says that it is not the right of any human being to decide who lives or dies – only God can make that choice.
But what is modern medicine if not direct human intervention which intends to defy the course of nature, and therefore God?
Before mankind invented/discovered such remarkable things as penicillin, antibiotics, x-rays, anti-retrovirals, etc., then people who were sick often died. When we talk about the number of deaths in third-world countries from easily curable illnesses, it is seen as a lamentable travesty that we have the means of intervention and yet do not provide it.
If the religious views of these particular pharmacists are taken to their logical conclusion, we might as well disband modern man-made medicines entirely as it is clearly interfering with God's will.
After all, who are we mere humans to decide who lives and who dies?
I am vegetarian and it is against my personal beliefs to kill animals for food. On that basis, can I get a job in a butcher's shop and refuse to sell meat to anyone? No I can't and I would never attempt to get job in such a place as it goes against my beliefs - so why are these people becoming pharmacists? Are there Christian Scientist pharmacists out there who don't believe in medical intervention but are allowed to continue in their jobs? It's ridiculous!!!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.