Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Guys, I'm off.
292 Answers
If anyone wants to get in touch with me, perhaps Mibs would be kind enough to act as go-between and pass any messages on to me.
It's been nice knowing you - and thanks for everything. x
It's been nice knowing you - and thanks for everything. x
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Ï too am unhappy.
Andy had good points
Naomi had good points.
I feel that the Ed could have handled it better as he "appeared" to take the side of Andy.
It isnt easy for the editorial team, catch 22...but to me it appears that they are not letting the "debates" flow.
Naomi is a valued contributor.........as is Andy.
Andy had good points
Naomi had good points.
I feel that the Ed could have handled it better as he "appeared" to take the side of Andy.
It isnt easy for the editorial team, catch 22...but to me it appears that they are not letting the "debates" flow.
Naomi is a valued contributor.........as is Andy.
-- answer removed --
As I said I think that Naomi is/was a great contributor, however it matters not what you may think of what Andy said and I for one couldn't see the reason for a personel attack.
What Naomi has displayed here is a total lack of maturity, as someone said if she was going why did she write this goodbye note.
What Naomi has displayed here is a total lack of maturity, as someone said if she was going why did she write this goodbye note.
Thanks woofgang - again I appreciate the support from everyone who has posted in my defence.
Sqad - i am speaking ipartially here - I think Naomi's post was removed because it contravenes AB rules - namely a direct personal insult, as opposed to simply debtating the stance offered.
On that basis, I don't think he can be accused of 'siding' - I think that rule is applied fairly when required - and was again here.
Sqad - i am speaking ipartially here - I think Naomi's post was removed because it contravenes AB rules - namely a direct personal insult, as opposed to simply debtating the stance offered.
On that basis, I don't think he can be accused of 'siding' - I think that rule is applied fairly when required - and was again here.