Guys, I'm off.

[naomi24]

If anyone wants to get in touch with me, perhaps Mibs would be kind enough to act as go-between and pass any messages on to me.

It's been nice knowing you - and thanks for everything. x

[Bbbananas]

I've looked at news - still can't see why.

Why you going naomi? Someone upset you?

[jd_1984]

Im lost! But take care naomi..

[mccfluff]

by naomi, i''ll miss your posts :-(

[jno]

Is this a flounce? It needs to be more, well, flouncy.

Feel free to change your mind and come back

[Rasman]

A huge loss. The Answerbank wont be the same without you.

Sincerely, no sarcasm or stupid wit.

You will be missed.
Whatever your reasons for leaving, reconsider?

[NOX]

Sorry to hear you're going, been thinking along similar lines myself lately, but what are your reasons for leaving may I ask?

[jackthehat]

Oh, heck, naomi..........please don't ? :o(

[Bbbananas]

Oh I see.....

If this is a flounce (and I don't think it is, I think Naomi is serious...) then, on the Bobbi Flounce Scale it scores a pretty low 5/10. ;-)

[ludwig]

Please reconsider.

[douglas9401]

Jeezo, let's help them both pick up their toys and set the pram upright.

[jno]

well, it could be one of those provisional flounces - "I'll go unless people plead with me to stay."

[NOX]

Okay, I see now. Well I too have issues with the police state that this site has become. Every time anyone embarks on a heated intellectual discussion it appears that an overzealous Ed takes the moral highground and intervenes and despite the fact that I can't see the removed post to judge it personally, I have a gut instinct (as Naomi isn't rude per se, merely intellectually acidic) that the post probably should have been allowed to stay. It's a sad day Ed when you start censoring people who are involved in a sensible serious debate thus driving away people who actually contribute to the site and don't fill it with inane ramblings and smutty inuendo just for the sake of it.

[Khandro]

Don't go!