ChatterBank4 mins ago
Arsenal Xi And Ref Rob Baggies
Title says it all . . .
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
ichkeria: Your comments are always welcome, however I fail to understand why you used the word robbed. My comment used the word rob which is defined as meaning to be deprived of something by deceit. In this instance the something was opportunity, deprived by both the deceitful player and the incompetent referee.
In fairness to the referee he was fooled as were a lot of other people by the theatrical dive for the first penalty. Without wishing to be too hard on West Brom, who certainly were unlucky with those penalties, they nonetheless didn't really look like winning or even scoring and in that respect can hardly be said to have been robbed.
Take the game to its full on hypothetical: Those two penalties should never have been awarded. There was a definite Arsenal hand-ball in their own penalty area. The outcome could have been so different, don't you think so ichkeria, if only the rules of the game had been observed?
The video does not lie.
I stand by . . . . Arsenal XI and Ref Rob Baggies.
The video does not lie.
I stand by . . . . Arsenal XI and Ref Rob Baggies.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.