ChatterBank2 mins ago
Sacked Teacher
Hi
Any thoughts on the teacher that was sacked for "restraining" a 16 year old youth who had thrown a milk shake into the teacher's face and was threatening(allegedly) to throw a chair as well ? The boy made no complaint nor did his parents yet the Headmaster and Governors decided to sack him as they thought he went too far !! Teachers have no chance these days. If I had done this when I was 16 (a very long time ago !!) I would have had the cane and probably been expelled.
FBG40
Any thoughts on the teacher that was sacked for "restraining" a 16 year old youth who had thrown a milk shake into the teacher's face and was threatening(allegedly) to throw a chair as well ? The boy made no complaint nor did his parents yet the Headmaster and Governors decided to sack him as they thought he went too far !! Teachers have no chance these days. If I had done this when I was 16 (a very long time ago !!) I would have had the cane and probably been expelled.
FBG40
Answers
Can I introduce a reasoned alternative instead of provoking either/or answers?
Over the past few decades we have seen teachers repeatedly being dissed for not teaching properly / hard enough / traditionall y enough / or not innovating.. .
one of the positives is that assistants who are not paid as teachers are now employed to do stuff like displays and...
Over the past few decades we have seen teachers repeatedly being dissed for not teaching properly / hard enough / traditionall
one of the positives is that assistants who are not paid as teachers are now employed to do stuff like displays and...
11:25 Wed 10th Oct 2012
I think it is sad that kids have no respect these days. All the control has been taken away from Teachers, Police and Parents... like you, when I was young I was actually scared of the repercussions if I were to dis-respect my teachers or police, not that I ever did. My parents were not strict but I knew I would be punished and it hurt! Don't get me wrong, I don't believe in corporal punishment or beating children etc, but when confronted with a situation like the teacher had, there should be each case looked into and dealt with sensibly without punishing the victim. How would each of you have dealt with it? I'd have probably done the same. There should be suitable punishments where the kids have respect. Sorry to say I have no idea what would be suitable... anyone have any solutions here?
Yes I have a kid at school, I am indeed fortunate that my kid got into grammar school. My heart goes out to the parents and indeed most of the kids trying to get an education in the standard comps. Over the last 40 years or so any form of control the staff had has been removed so all they can do is expell and often now they can't even do that because time and again a load of wierd beard governors will reverse the process. I'd not advise anyone to go into teaching these days.
I think the point is you're just getting your opinion from this story.
They've showed a stock picture of a milkshake in a glass in case you don't know what one looks like - or might think that it was in a carton (which I suspect it was - schools don't like glasses they get broken)
And you've not seen the CCVT footage which the panels have and they all support the school.
All in all I'm more likely to trust those deciding on evidence than those going on prejudice and newspaper reports
They've showed a stock picture of a milkshake in a glass in case you don't know what one looks like - or might think that it was in a carton (which I suspect it was - schools don't like glasses they get broken)
And you've not seen the CCVT footage which the panels have and they all support the school.
All in all I'm more likely to trust those deciding on evidence than those going on prejudice and newspaper reports
Teachers have a very difficult job and often to put up with being shoved and having things thrown at them. They have to be able to defuse situations and not use unnecessary force. I think his colleagues and union would have defended him better if he was blameless. I got the impression he 'lost it' and held on to the boy longer than was necessary. He should have sent a pupil to get help.
Can I introduce a reasoned alternative instead of provoking either/or answers?
Over the past few decades we have seen teachers repeatedly being dissed for not teaching properly / hard enough / traditionally enough / or not innovating...
one of the positives is that assistants who are not paid as teachers are now employed to do stuff like displays and other non-teaching tasks.
However for some reason teachers are still expected to act as general security staff around schools. Especially in secondary schools, this is a hiding to nothing. Our litigious society ensures that the ones most likely to be r-soles are the ones who 'know their rights'.
Secondary schools especially should employ dedicated non-teaching staff to ensure standards of behaviour are met around school premises.
Teachers should be allowed to teach. Pupils who kick off in lessons should be removed and dealt with by dedicated behavioural staff.
No schools do this. BTW it's normal practice on the continent.
Also normal in France and Germany is the fact that kids are not allowed to progress with their peers if they repeatedly fail standard tests. This motivates kids to keep up, seek help if struggling or drop out if they want to not work.
The parents of many of these troubled young people do not want them round the house all day - schools in England provide a no-questions-asked childminding service without enforcing anything in return.
Specifically with this school, the Head states 'children can't misbehave here because or standards are improving'.....this is weasle-wording that would make a jesuit blush. Take a look at their league table scores - four fifths of their pupils leave without decent qualifications. I suggest plenty of room for misbehaviour there.
Sadly, the bloke should not have touched the kid, and so put himself in the wrong. I feel very sorry for him and the hundreds who endure the vileness of feral youths without the intelligent support of the organisations they work for.
Over the past few decades we have seen teachers repeatedly being dissed for not teaching properly / hard enough / traditionally enough / or not innovating...
one of the positives is that assistants who are not paid as teachers are now employed to do stuff like displays and other non-teaching tasks.
However for some reason teachers are still expected to act as general security staff around schools. Especially in secondary schools, this is a hiding to nothing. Our litigious society ensures that the ones most likely to be r-soles are the ones who 'know their rights'.
Secondary schools especially should employ dedicated non-teaching staff to ensure standards of behaviour are met around school premises.
Teachers should be allowed to teach. Pupils who kick off in lessons should be removed and dealt with by dedicated behavioural staff.
No schools do this. BTW it's normal practice on the continent.
Also normal in France and Germany is the fact that kids are not allowed to progress with their peers if they repeatedly fail standard tests. This motivates kids to keep up, seek help if struggling or drop out if they want to not work.
The parents of many of these troubled young people do not want them round the house all day - schools in England provide a no-questions-asked childminding service without enforcing anything in return.
Specifically with this school, the Head states 'children can't misbehave here because or standards are improving'.....this is weasle-wording that would make a jesuit blush. Take a look at their league table scores - four fifths of their pupils leave without decent qualifications. I suggest plenty of room for misbehaviour there.
Sadly, the bloke should not have touched the kid, and so put himself in the wrong. I feel very sorry for him and the hundreds who endure the vileness of feral youths without the intelligent support of the organisations they work for.
I entered a thread regarding this in September, yes it is very sad that this teachers career is now ruined for good, just because of a disruptive pupil, what kind of message does this give out?
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 69944.h tml
http://
if the oik threw a milkshake in his face he should have grabbed him and given him a good slap, he might think twice about doing it again to a teacher.
But no the teacher loses his job and the oik can do it again with impunity safe in the knowledge theres not much can be done about him.
"aggressively pinning the 16-year-old's arms to his sides"
I dont see any problem with that, sounds like the witnesses are another bunch of politically correct fanatics scared of their own shadows that are running our schools.
and people wonder how comes we turn out so much uneducated junk from our schools..well this case is part of your answer
But no the teacher loses his job and the oik can do it again with impunity safe in the knowledge theres not much can be done about him.
"aggressively pinning the 16-year-old's arms to his sides"
I dont see any problem with that, sounds like the witnesses are another bunch of politically correct fanatics scared of their own shadows that are running our schools.
and people wonder how comes we turn out so much uneducated junk from our schools..well this case is part of your answer
And we see some of the liberal hand wringers on here don't we Jake.
Regardless of this particular case, teachers are on a hiding to nothing. Damned if they do Damned if they dont.
Oh, and expected by the lilley livered liberals to have things thrown at them (including fists) and just turn the other cheek.
Why do we have troubles in our schools and on the strrets, just look at liberal policy for your answer.
Regardless of this particular case, teachers are on a hiding to nothing. Damned if they do Damned if they dont.
Oh, and expected by the lilley livered liberals to have things thrown at them (including fists) and just turn the other cheek.
Why do we have troubles in our schools and on the strrets, just look at liberal policy for your answer.