ChatterBank4 mins ago
StopBadware.org
Has this been introduced into the latest Firefox update?
For a long time I have been visiting livesportontv.com in Firefox without any problems and suddenly the site invokes dire warnings of the end of the world because someone at sometime has reported it.
Personally I don't believe it and am willing to take the risk but since there doesn't seem to be a way to allow individual sites through, you have to disable checking for ALL sites.
Since I've never come across StopBadware.org until now, is this completely new? Or has it been around for ages, with the warning that I am getting for liveportontv a real indication that there is a new problem with that site?
For a long time I have been visiting livesportontv.com in Firefox without any problems and suddenly the site invokes dire warnings of the end of the world because someone at sometime has reported it.
Personally I don't believe it and am willing to take the risk but since there doesn't seem to be a way to allow individual sites through, you have to disable checking for ALL sites.
Since I've never come across StopBadware.org until now, is this completely new? Or has it been around for ages, with the warning that I am getting for liveportontv a real indication that there is a new problem with that site?
Answers
I have just been there ...
This is the report .. like I said ...
Quote ...
Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?
Over the past 90 days, livesportont v.com appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 2 site(s) including livesportont v.eu/, livefootball ontv.co.uk/.
Has this...
This is the report .. like I said ...
Quote ...
Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?
Over the past 90 days, livesportont
Has this...
13:36 Sat 26th Jun 2010
Mcafee thinks the site is OK
http://www.siteadviso...tes/livesportontv.com
as does Norton
http://safeweb.norton...sportontv.com&x=0&y=0
http://www.siteadviso...tes/livesportontv.com
as does Norton
http://safeweb.norton...sportontv.com&x=0&y=0
I have just been there ...
This is the report .. like I said ...
Quote ...
Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?
Over the past 90 days, livesportontv.com appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 2 site(s) including livesportontv.eu/, livefootballontv.co.uk/.
Has this site hosted malware?
No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days.
How did this happen?
In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message.
This is the report .. like I said ...
Quote ...
Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?
Over the past 90 days, livesportontv.com appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 2 site(s) including livesportontv.eu/, livefootballontv.co.uk/.
Has this site hosted malware?
No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days.
How did this happen?
In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message.
Thanks, I have seen that already.
My instinct is to trust the site more than I trust that blocker because, as Chuck has put in his posting, other checks (also WOT) reckon that it's ok. I've also been using it for at least a couple of years without any problems.
And so, since that setting is a check for all sites or none, I've switched it off. I wouldn't mind having it on for unknown sites that I come across but it doesn't allow for individual sites to be exempted.
But has this check been included in the 3.6.4 release for the first time?
My instinct is to trust the site more than I trust that blocker because, as Chuck has put in his posting, other checks (also WOT) reckon that it's ok. I've also been using it for at least a couple of years without any problems.
And so, since that setting is a check for all sites or none, I've switched it off. I wouldn't mind having it on for unknown sites that I come across but it doesn't allow for individual sites to be exempted.
But has this check been included in the 3.6.4 release for the first time?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.