ChatterBank24 mins ago
Sign Language
13 Answers
We were discussing sign language the other day and someone was surprised when I said there were several versions of it eg, BSL. Can someone please explain why there are different versions of it? I can understand why the word for something is different in different languages but I would expect the "sign" to be universal.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bhg481. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.There's also Makaton
Matakon signs are based on the gestures used in BSL (British Sign Language – the language of the Deaf community). However, unlike BSL, Makaton signs are used in conjunction with speech at all times and in English grammatical word order. With Makaton, children and adults can communicate using signs and symbols.
We used this at my last school.
Matakon signs are based on the gestures used in BSL (British Sign Language – the language of the Deaf community). However, unlike BSL, Makaton signs are used in conjunction with speech at all times and in English grammatical word order. With Makaton, children and adults can communicate using signs and symbols.
We used this at my last school.
Even if the sign for ball was the same the world over most sign languages don’t communicate with individual words that form a sentence, as in speech. There could be a different sign for bouncing a ball, throwing a ball, catching, kicking… A very long spoken sentence may be signed using few signs combined with facial expressions.
What may be a correct sign in BSL could be a rude, insulting gesture in Japan regardless of whether it is recognised as sign language or not.
As far as I know all forms of sign language has signs to represent the alphabet so uncommon words and names can be spelt. There are at least 5 different alphabets so it makes a universal sign language difficult.
Just as the spoken language has developed over many years, so has sign languages so naturally they are different.
What may be a correct sign in BSL could be a rude, insulting gesture in Japan regardless of whether it is recognised as sign language or not.
As far as I know all forms of sign language has signs to represent the alphabet so uncommon words and names can be spelt. There are at least 5 different alphabets so it makes a universal sign language difficult.
Just as the spoken language has developed over many years, so has sign languages so naturally they are different.
If you scroll down to 'Relationships with spoken languages', here
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Sign_ languag e
you'll find a well-written explanation, which would seem to answer your question for you.
https:/
you'll find a well-written explanation, which would seem to answer your question for you.
oh god I thought you mean dfft versions of BSL ( dialects) - - olds such as myself tend to use SAE ( sign assisted English) and this is very frowned upon by purists
ASL has a one=handed alphabet.
Chico's article is a bit long. Vygotsky said that thought preceded language and doesnt get a look in.
take a look at this
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Nicar aguan_S ign_Lan guage
Kegl did NOT introduce Spanish or Portuguese SL but allowed a distinct one to develop. annd then wrote it up and made a program where she gushed " we were watching the BIRTH of a language". Other linguists gushed less and were more critical
ASL has a one=handed alphabet.
Chico's article is a bit long. Vygotsky said that thought preceded language and doesnt get a look in.
take a look at this
https:/
Kegl did NOT introduce Spanish or Portuguese SL but allowed a distinct one to develop. annd then wrote it up and made a program where she gushed " we were watching the BIRTH of a language". Other linguists gushed less and were more critical