Donate SIGN UP

Next Year Female Troops Will Be Sent Into Battle Alongside Male Soldiers If Our Army Becomes Operational. Can You See Any Issues Concerning This Decision That Might Arise If The Enemy Is Is?

Avatar Image
Colmc54 | 21:39 Sun 20th Dec 2015 | News
39 Answers
Enter Further Question Details Here...
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 39 of 39rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Colmc54. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The issue will be when females are returned in body bags after videos of their torture have been broadcast around the world as propaganda.

This may well not sit well with some, especially if the press go OTT on it.

-- answer removed --
Thanks for that Baldric.
Glad to see Colonel Kemp reiterating what I've said about females in infantry units many, many times on these boards.

Having been there, in the past, and got the T-shirt as it were,
I agree with him 100%.
Boudicca and the Russian infantry were well before the pc legions and elfin safety squadrons had us in their grip. The MD will be forking out compo. by the squillion in no time.
Women would be as good as men in battle.

BUT......

What would they do, if faced by a 10 year old girl, holding an AK47 came at them, COULD THEY SHOOT HER ?????
The female trooper involved in this wasn't squeamish when it came to pulling the trigger.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Robinson_(loyalist)
Granted sandy, but killing someone with a pistol in a covert operation on the streets of UK is a far cry from a 15 mile patrol/advance-to-contact with full kit, bergen and rifle/LMG over arduous terrain.
// . The (physical) standard of recruits is instantly reduced. We now get people who previously would have been rejected.//

good point db - I wonder when we will start getting women in the police for example ....
-- answer removed --
Question Author
Of but if we subscribers to that and there was no pressure from civil society for the armed forces to change then this issue would not exist as there would be female soldiers, or homosexuals for that matter in the British army.
Question Author
Sorry I should have indicated that the above was a response to SP 1814's last comment.
Question Author
P's Females are not the same as males in all things. They have a uterus and can be put to work producing more brainwashed soldiers for the current manifestation of superstition-driven primordialism. Good luck to them if we ever deploy ground troops again in the territory of the aberration of Humanity, never to be seen or heard of again.
Merry Christmas by the way.

I'll have a half of whatever he's ^ been on, cheers!
Question Author
Monkey Shoulder malt scotch in fact. You're welcome to try it but a 'half' would make you unconscious.
I still believe it would be a mistake to deploy female combat troops against IS and AQ. Any other enemy fair enough but not against them.


My posts @ 1628 and 2058 ^^^ say I agree with you
Changing acceptance test standards is a different question/separate decision.
Question Author
Surely we must agree that there is a case for the British Ministry Of Defence to ensure that female soldiers are not put at risk of being deployed against an enemy that will use them in what we might euphemistically describe as divergent gender specific rolls if they became prisoners.

21 to 39 of 39rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Next Year Female Troops Will Be Sent Into Battle Alongside Male Soldiers If Our Army Becomes Operational. Can You See Any Issues Concerning This Decision That Might Arise If The Enemy Is Is?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.