My school's r/e classes went through the entire smorgasbord so fast that no idea had time to settle or be cogitated over. Of course, by the end of it I had concluded "they can't all be right". I also like to think that if two or more sides cannot agree about a fact (in the realm of the unproveable), they are probably both wrong. Hence I ended up atheist. Oh, the irony.
Thinking back, the presentation of other faiths of the world was quite anodyne. I don't think my early-teens self could have processed stuff like misogyny properly. Worst case scenario is that cocky young males think "hey, I hadn't thought of that" and set about thinking themselves superior to girls. Could lead to a difficult marital life, if they even get that far.
What baffles me most is how muslim women just accept it (take it laying down if you'll pardon the expression). Other than fulfilling the function their DNA programs them to do, I don't see what they get out of it.
@naomi
I think the "teaching the controversy" approach (I'm inverting a maxim of creationists, as you'll have noticed) risks a hate-speech lawsuit. It would be great to see one played out and lose but, number one, no organisation wants to take an avoidable risk and, number two, if Arabic words have multiple meanings* so diverse as to make every single sub-clause of Koranic verse into a twisty, turny thing which can switch from stern punishment and beating in one translation to "a light tap" in another. It can lawyer itself out of any close inspection by non-experts and a court would rule against the defendant.
* I didn't read the link I'd posted in full until yesterday. In the depths of the article it gives examples where, of four meanings of a word, two are almost diametric opposites. English is bad for multiple meanings but this is in another league.