Eu Rules Or Our Own Judicial, Who Is To Blame In Such Cases?

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3467569/Judge-lets-Romanian-rapist-Britain-break-EU-law-deport-home-country.html

[retrocop]

Ultimately it will be David Cameron if he wins the stay in vote.!

[anotheoldgit]

Welcome back retro and all my best wishes for the future.

[retrocop]

Thank you Mr aog. Good to be with you again.

[anotheoldgit]

Incidentally, 'The Judge' earlier informed me that even if we get out of the EU, it won't effect the European Court of Human Rights, since they are a separate organisation.

[tamborine]

Free movement over europe is ONLY an entitlement for subjects in EU member states. Non member subjects should be returned to their homelands till they achieve legal rights to migrate.

http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=457

[New Judge]

It was the EU’s “Freedom of movement” rules that allowed him to come here in the first place. In this ruling the court said that Theresa May’s “deport first, appeal later” procedure was incompatible with those rules. As well as this, though, it was stated that Mr Gheorghiu’s Human Rights under article 8 (the right to a family life) would be infringed were not allowed to stay. (These rights are also enshrined in our own 1998 Human Rights Act, so it is doubtful he would have needed to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights on this aspect).

So my answer is it is EU rules which allowed him to come and EU rules which the tribunal stated should allow him to stay. If we (Or Romania) had not been EU members it is doubtful he would have been here in the first place.