ChatterBank7 mins ago
Crocodile Tears From Mr Blair Or Was He Misled?
60 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-3671 2735
Do you buy his "good faith" message? If not what where his reasons?
surprised no one has asked a question on this so here it is.
Do you buy his "good faith" message? If not what where his reasons?
surprised no one has asked a question on this so here it is.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Surely if he lied then he knew the truth? My understanding is that Chilcot doesn't say Blair knew the truth about WMDs, merely that he was too eager to accept the reports of their existence. This would mean that he was horribly wrong and far too gullible at a time when he absolutely couldn't afford to be, but calling him a liar seems mistaken.
That doesn't change the fact that lies are deliberate untruths. If he didn't know that there were no WMDs then he couldn't lie about it.
As to yesterday, I've not seen it. I heard an interview this morning on Today where he was trying, and probably failing, to maintain his position as far as possible.
As to yesterday, I've not seen it. I heard an interview this morning on Today where he was trying, and probably failing, to maintain his position as far as possible.
I think BigBad is right
Bliar looks on himself chiefly as a victim
( and this episode as unfortunate as it is for the dead soldiers and their families ) the main disadvantage is to one Mr Bliar and his wonderful ideas for his own lucrative future
oh and plausible deniability - he is in a posiiton to say - well at the time it looked like a really good idea and once you pay spooks ( MI5 that is ) to spook you, you dont turn around and say - you're speaking bullocks ....
[ not after all the money one has pumped into MI5 ]
Bliar looks on himself chiefly as a victim
( and this episode as unfortunate as it is for the dead soldiers and their families ) the main disadvantage is to one Mr Bliar and his wonderful ideas for his own lucrative future
oh and plausible deniability - he is in a posiiton to say - well at the time it looked like a really good idea and once you pay spooks ( MI5 that is ) to spook you, you dont turn around and say - you're speaking bullocks ....
[ not after all the money one has pumped into MI5 ]
// PP and jno If you wish to discuss the rights/wrongs or morality of Dresden/Coventry/London Blitz then start your own thread. //
thx for that advice retro - but someone ( not naming who ) said that in his experience Bliar was the only PM to be accused to being a war criminal .....
and I was offering a counter example - only for that person's own educational purposes of course. I stand reproved by someone who knows and follows thread rules.....
thx for that advice retro - but someone ( not naming who ) said that in his experience Bliar was the only PM to be accused to being a war criminal .....
and I was offering a counter example - only for that person's own educational purposes of course. I stand reproved by someone who knows and follows thread rules.....
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.