Donate SIGN UP
Home > News > If The Police Have No Objection To The Edl's Peaceful March, Shouldn't It Be Their Opposing Groups Who Should Be Banned, Thus Ensuring Peace Remains?

If The Police Have No Objection To The Edl's Peaceful March, Shouldn't It Be Their Opposing Groups Who Should Be Banned, Thus Ensuring Peace Remains?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 11:07 Fri 05th Aug 2016 | News
23 Answers
http://www.nottinghampost.com/edl-march-risk-to-children-and-families-claims-nottingham-city-council/story-29584832-detail/story.html

prev When Will They Give It A Rest?
  
next Brazil Olympics
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 23 of 23rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Avatar Image Gromit
I fear that the EDL have seen better days, and are well on their way to obscurity.
The turnout for this Nottingham protest is paltry. You could fit the lot of them in one double decker bus. The police outnumber them 10 to 1.
14:35 Sat 06th Aug 2016
Avatar Image Peter Pedant
erm did I read:

"and opposing groups shall be banned to maintain peace" ?

who first said - "you create a desert and call it peace"

yup first non-Roman quote in Latin - about the conquest of northern ENgland. Principle lives on in AOG
14:42 Sat 06th Aug 2016
-- answer removed --

21 to 23 of 23rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

If The Police Have No Objection To The Edl's Peaceful March, Shouldn't It Be Their Opposing Groups Who Should Be Banned, Thus Ensuring Peace Remains?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.