I have to take issue with mikey on this point.
I do not believe that the amount of wealth and apparent irresponsible behaviour of any individual makes the fact that they were robbed and terrified any more acceptable, which is what your post implies.
Ms. Kardashian may be famous for being famous, and seriously wealthy, but that does not mean that she should be any more or less vulnerable to robbery and assault than the proverbial old lady being robbed of her pension.
To suggest that such a crime is somehow excusable on the basis of the wealth and notoriety of the victim is to imply that she was deserving of the crime and loss, and than is an abhorrent view to take in my opinion.