Donate SIGN UP

Len Mccluskey U Turn

Avatar Image
cassa333 | 09:45 Wed 17th May 2017 | News
8 Answers
Didn't take long for good old Len to be told off and start to get fully behind Labour.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-39944331

So Tuesday he was not optomistic but a day later he was 'now fully behind' Labour.

Is that the quickest U turn? Can anyone find a speedier one?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by cassa333. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
But Len IS labour!
If Len is Labour, but he's fully behind Labour, then that must mean that his head's stuck up his own...

I don't think Labour will win either, but that doesn't stop me from being 100% the behind the Party.
how can winning just 200 seats be a just result, seems strange he should think so.
This thread is more about the U-turn.

I happen to agree with Len's comments yesterday (200 seats would be good) but not with his todays comment of 'We can Win'
The lefties are about to misappropriate another word for their own personal use. From now on "win" is to be defined as not losing as heavily as they dread. It will join the lexicon of words and phrases to enter their "Newspeak dictionary". Win, New Def. 1984 Dict. "to avoid losing by a margin that may be considered the worst possible"
I guess that's a bit like "our policies are fully costed" meaning "excel spreadsheet prepared by Diane Abbott".....
I guess that's a bit like "our policies are fully costed" meaning "excel spreadsheet prepared by Diane Abbott".....

1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Len Mccluskey U Turn

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.