ChatterBank0 min ago
Henry V
I have seen it written, that Henry VII was the only Welshman to sit on the English throne, as he was in Pembroke Castle.
But Henry V was born in Monmouth Castle, which is now part of Wales, so can he also be termed a "Welshman on the throne of England"......ie, was Monmouth counted part of Wales in August 1386 ?
Shakespeare had him down as Welsh I notice :::
"I wear it ( a leek ) with pride, for I am Welsh you know, good countryman.
But Henry V was born in Monmouth Castle, which is now part of Wales, so can he also be termed a "Welshman on the throne of England"......ie, was Monmouth counted part of Wales in August 1386 ?
Shakespeare had him down as Welsh I notice :::
"I wear it ( a leek ) with pride, for I am Welsh you know, good countryman.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Interesting question Mikey. I can't find anything that confirms when Monmouth was 'christened'. This website says Monmouthshire (and therefor presumably Monmouth has never been English):
http:// www.jlb 2011.co .uk/wal es/mon. htm
http://
>>> I have seen it written, that Henry VII was the only Welshman to sit on the English throne, as he was in Pembroke Castle
On the BBC website this morning?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -wales- south-w est-wal es-4019 0701
Monmouth was under the control of the House of Lancaster when Henry V was born:
http:// www.mon mouth.o rg.uk/i ndex.ph p/local /histor y/wales -or-eng land.ht ml
With regard to your Shakespearean reference, this might be of interest:
http:// www.agi ncourt6 00.com/ 2015/10 /03/for -i-am-w elsh-yo u-know- welshme n-myth- and-rea lity-at -aginco urt/
On the BBC website this morning?
http://
Monmouth was under the control of the House of Lancaster when Henry V was born:
http://
With regard to your Shakespearean reference, this might be of interest:
http://
Apparently, his birthday is the subject of speculation:
'Some say his birthday was 9 August 1387, but an alternative date is 16 September 1386. '
http:// www.his toryext ra.com/ article /milita ry-hist ory/10- facts-h enry-v- and-bat tle-agi ncourt
'Some say his birthday was 9 August 1387, but an alternative date is 16 September 1386. '
http://
Thanks everybody !
A tricky question it would seem. I am not sure if Wales was recognised as a separate country in the 1300's, as it was a collection of shires at the time.
Yes Chris....it was the bit on the BBC Wales website that made me think of this today, and yes, you are right, the point about Calais is true.
But until I have it proved differently, I am claiming Henry V for Wales !
A tricky question it would seem. I am not sure if Wales was recognised as a separate country in the 1300's, as it was a collection of shires at the time.
Yes Chris....it was the bit on the BBC Wales website that made me think of this today, and yes, you are right, the point about Calais is true.
But until I have it proved differently, I am claiming Henry V for Wales !
Yes, I agree Zacs. The drive up from Tintern to Monmouth is beautiful. There is a Pub, right on the river, about halfway, called The Boat Inn, at Penallt, which you access by walking over he old railway bridge. I have spent many an evening there over the years, but never, unfortunately, when the trains were still running !
https:/ /www.tr ipadvis or.co.u k/Resta urant_R eview-g 2630822 -d23697 52-Revi ews-The _Boat_I nn-Pena llt_Mon mouthsh ire_Sou th_Wale s_Wales .html
https:/
Immediately following the Norman Conquest of England castles were built along the Anglo-Welsh border to fend of the 'barbarian' Celts. For several centuries this region of Marches - 'Welsh' land manned by English soldiers - was ruled by Marcher Lords who had nearly all of the rights that belonged to the King in other parts of the Kingdom.
Although technically in the control of England from 1067, it was not until Henry VIII's Acts Of Union, in the 16th century, that the Marches were declared separate counties and part of England.
The Laws in Wales Act 1535 treated the new county of Monmouthshire in a different manner to the other four creations; Brecknockshire, Radnorshire, Montgomeryshire and Denbighshire were each required to elect one Knight to Parliament in common with all other Shires "within the said Country of Dominion of Wales" whereas Monmouthshire required two Knights, as required by "all other Shires of this Realm of England".
Also the Laws in Wales Act 1542 specifically enumerates the Welsh counties as twelve in number, excluding Monmouthshire from the count.
To all intents and purposes, Monmouthshire only became Welsh when it came under the remit of The Welsh Office upon its creation in 1964.
Although technically in the control of England from 1067, it was not until Henry VIII's Acts Of Union, in the 16th century, that the Marches were declared separate counties and part of England.
The Laws in Wales Act 1535 treated the new county of Monmouthshire in a different manner to the other four creations; Brecknockshire, Radnorshire, Montgomeryshire and Denbighshire were each required to elect one Knight to Parliament in common with all other Shires "within the said Country of Dominion of Wales" whereas Monmouthshire required two Knights, as required by "all other Shires of this Realm of England".
Also the Laws in Wales Act 1542 specifically enumerates the Welsh counties as twelve in number, excluding Monmouthshire from the count.
To all intents and purposes, Monmouthshire only became Welsh when it came under the remit of The Welsh Office upon its creation in 1964.