News1 min ago
Is The Snp Approach To Politics Becoming Like Thatcher Was To Scotland
34 Answers
Margaret Thatchers leadership and negative attitudes towards Scotland was toxic but are the SNP not being similar with its dogmatic arrogant approach to Brexit and using indyref2 as a threat are they not alienating people in Scotland the way Thatcher did
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gordiescotland1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."Let's face facts here. Thatcher was so hell bent on damaging her own Country,..."
First of all, Lady Thatcher's "own" country was the United Kingdom, not England. But, if what you contend is true (which is far from a "fact") why do you think she was so intent on damaging the UK or any part of it? And just out of curiosity, were you around (and more importantly, trying to earn a living) in the 1970s?
But back to more sensible matters, I don't actually get the point of requiring a "super majority" for major constitutional changes. Why should the status quo be afforded such an advantage? Examine it the other way round (using the Scottish Independence issue as an example): "Unless at least 65% of those voting choose to remain in the UK, we'll be leaving". Fair? Certainly not. So why is it fair the other way round. Using 65% as the threshold, almost two out of three people could vote for a change and it would still not be implemented. and that's not very democratic.
First of all, Lady Thatcher's "own" country was the United Kingdom, not England. But, if what you contend is true (which is far from a "fact") why do you think she was so intent on damaging the UK or any part of it? And just out of curiosity, were you around (and more importantly, trying to earn a living) in the 1970s?
But back to more sensible matters, I don't actually get the point of requiring a "super majority" for major constitutional changes. Why should the status quo be afforded such an advantage? Examine it the other way round (using the Scottish Independence issue as an example): "Unless at least 65% of those voting choose to remain in the UK, we'll be leaving". Fair? Certainly not. So why is it fair the other way round. Using 65% as the threshold, almost two out of three people could vote for a change and it would still not be implemented. and that's not very democratic.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.