Road rules1 min ago
Has Britain Gained Anything From Multiculturalism?
39 Answers
This is the negative side of Multiculturalism, Pakistani child grooming gangs, British bred Islamic terrorists and Black on Black killings on our streets.
Answers
Of course AOG is referring to immigration / multicutural
10:28 Sat 16th Jun 2018
There seems to be some sort of misconception about humans, we are animals, tool using, clothes wearing, highly evolved animals so we breed, excrete, etc like any other. That being accepted our behaviour has parallels in nature, in territorialism, in competition, and in conflict with rivals and perceived threats. On this basis all humans are the same species, it is only socialization, and training the things that create cultures that makes us seem to differ.
Our barriers are our tribal territories on a larger scale. Had we all remained in our own places eventually we ,like Darwin's finches would become different species unable to interbreed, this has not happened. I am not saying that there aren't those within the world's sub groups who for whatever reason don't conform but like reports of rogue creatures, these are very rare, but the act of reporting increases the seriousness of how the situation is seen. The British Empire was not all Tiffin and tea, or pink gin and children banished to the nursery it was a time of suppression,repression and appalling abuses.
Our barriers are our tribal territories on a larger scale. Had we all remained in our own places eventually we ,like Darwin's finches would become different species unable to interbreed, this has not happened. I am not saying that there aren't those within the world's sub groups who for whatever reason don't conform but like reports of rogue creatures, these are very rare, but the act of reporting increases the seriousness of how the situation is seen. The British Empire was not all Tiffin and tea, or pink gin and children banished to the nursery it was a time of suppression,repression and appalling abuses.
//how quickly people forget ...... and revert to the 'good old days' //
This deliberate (or perhaps witless) mischaracterisation is very tiresome.
The critics of multi-culturalism (which is not the same thing as pluralism) do not attack it out of nostalgia. They attack it because they can make the distinction between change which is useful and change which isn't.
This deliberate (or perhaps witless) mischaracterisation is very tiresome.
The critics of multi-culturalism (which is not the same thing as pluralism) do not attack it out of nostalgia. They attack it because they can make the distinction between change which is useful and change which isn't.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.