She's obviously a very pretty *little girl* in the first photo with her sisters...but all three are.
The main photos are so photoshopped that she looks totally unreal. That's manufactured beauty. I really don't think there is any such thing as the beautiful in the world.
I've been waiting to see these pictures all day as they wouldn't open at work. What a load of cobblers. The natural pictures with her sisters they are all beautiful in a natural way - as are most 5 year olds. The pictures in question though are ridiculous - not her hair and photoshopped almost to the point of insult (weren't the whites of her eyes white enough without making them unreal?).
I'm not comfortable with referring to a child of that age 'beautiful' . It all looks very false and posed, yes they are all pretty but too young to label.
She is absolutely exquisite and they are beautiful and typical modelling shots, the pose, the grade, the style, the light and the photoshopping. Tbh you can make most people look considerably better than they are in real life with all of the above, but however hard you try, what I find beautiful someone else won't, rinse and repeat for the whole of humanity, so 'the' most beautiful girl in the world only to some, therefore it's an erroneous title.