ChatterBank2 mins ago
Racist Beeps At Black Lady
https:/
Careful who you beep at. Bet the garage CCTV is 'interesting'.
Careful who you beep at. Bet the garage CCTV is 'interesting'.
Answers
// If the black woman who got "beeped" at found it racist / offensive, then it was exactly that. // Spath appears to be saying something ridiculous here, and indeed he is, but in actual fact he's just stating the position of the law. The police are obliged to investigate any incident that the accuser defines as being racist. "He looked at me in a way I interpret as...
13:21 Mon 05th Nov 2018
// So this "beeping" incident will be recorded as a racist incident because the lady perceived it to be so. //
Which is obviously wrong NJ, as I'm sure you agree. The wording 'racist incident' implies guilt where there is none. Clearly it should be called an 'incident of perceived racism' or something similar.
Which is obviously wrong NJ, as I'm sure you agree. The wording 'racist incident' implies guilt where there is none. Clearly it should be called an 'incident of perceived racism' or something similar.
"The wording 'racist incident' implies guilt where there is none. Clearly it should be called an 'incident of perceived racism' or something similar."
The problem is, ludwig, that when the lunatics run the asylum (as with this and the gender recognition issue which I commented on in another thread) logic goes out of the window.
My Lord McPherson was probably trying to be helpful with his recommendations. But this particular one states that an incident must be logged as racist if any individual deems it so. More than that, the individual need not be an alleged victim (though the recommendation did not include the word "alleged") or even present at the scene. This is clearly, as you say, utter nonsense. In any sane forum the recipients of the report would have simply said "Thanks for your time, My Lord, but this particular recommendation is utter tosh and we won't be accepting it thanks". But of course this is a matter of race and so enthralled are the authorities with the race lobby that such a response would be unthinkable.
The problem is, ludwig, that when the lunatics run the asylum (as with this and the gender recognition issue which I commented on in another thread) logic goes out of the window.
My Lord McPherson was probably trying to be helpful with his recommendations. But this particular one states that an incident must be logged as racist if any individual deems it so. More than that, the individual need not be an alleged victim (though the recommendation did not include the word "alleged") or even present at the scene. This is clearly, as you say, utter nonsense. In any sane forum the recipients of the report would have simply said "Thanks for your time, My Lord, but this particular recommendation is utter tosh and we won't be accepting it thanks". But of course this is a matter of race and so enthralled are the authorities with the race lobby that such a response would be unthinkable.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank2 mins ago
Film, Media & TV4 mins ago
News4 mins ago
Arts & Literature5 mins ago
B B C Late To The Party And Of Course...
News12 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.