//Well, there are morals. And there are laws. But there is nothing in legislatures which specifically defines one entwined with t’other//
Quite right. Neither is there anything in "legislatures" which entwines theft and gravity. "Law", like other words such as "apprehension" has more than a single meaning.
Moral "law" is the assertion that the revulsion most of us feel at the recent killing of the holocaust survivor is based on something other than a biologically or culturallyinmduced knee-jerk.
But that’s not a ‘law’ is it. That’s just a ‘normal’ reaction to a terrible event for anyone who’s been brought up with any appreciation for, and consideration of, other human life. To call it a ‘law’ is misleading in the extreme and likely to make any debate tangential to what I think the OP actually meant.
I always thought that the ten commandments helped to form our moral compass. From an early age most older people probably attended Sunday School. The commandments taught us right from wrong. They are not man made laws but a moral framework to life. Nowadays not as many children attend Sunday Schools and grow up without the slightest clue as to what morals are.
Naomi - You ask why God did not create us as imperatively moral beings.
If He did, we would have no choice, and love requires a choice.
Anyway, as usual, you are true to form, and nit picking for the sake of ....... Nit picking!
All I do know 'personally' .. is that I struggle in mind and body if I don't follow a moral path. We face a choice, there have been times I've slightly veered off that path, and it didn't feel good at all.