ChatterBank3 mins ago
Whipped For Loving..
religion of peace..mmm the face of islam you do not see on bbc, i wonder why..guess trump is more news worthy, considered a racist..but hey whats happening is ok though.
https:/
https:/
Answers
Ignorance and mockery from the usual quarters I see. (And since I started writing this post a believer in moral relativism: all cuktures and practices are qual.) Another normal crazy day on AB then. Aceh province is a part of "moderate" Indonesia which has adopted Sharia and its penal code the hadood. Whippings, stonings and amputations are not extreme,...
21:03 Wed 31st Jul 2019
AOG - //
Well there you have it, they are clearly uncivilised, then being civilised as we are, that makes us better or indeed superior to them, which in turn by the definition of racism, that also makes you a racist Andy. //
I did hope that you would maybe think about the dreadful insult you have offered in that post, and retract it, but I am not at all surprised that you as you always do when exposed as wrong - you have simply walked away.
I have decided on an appropriate course of action.
Well there you have it, they are clearly uncivilised, then being civilised as we are, that makes us better or indeed superior to them, which in turn by the definition of racism, that also makes you a racist Andy. //
I did hope that you would maybe think about the dreadful insult you have offered in that post, and retract it, but I am not at all surprised that you as you always do when exposed as wrong - you have simply walked away.
I have decided on an appropriate course of action.
God knows why Naomi (or anyone else for that matter) continues to "engage" (not really the right word, is it?) with someone who lacks the basic moral quality needed to discuss honestly any point of difference: you believe A, I believe B; is our disagreement over the facts? In which case let's examine the facts; or do we, perhaps, agree about the facts, but disagree about the methods by which we mitigate harm and promote good.
The latter is the usual case: we agree broadly about the facts, but differ strongly on the means by which we redress social evils. And that's why we have political parties offering alternative solutions.
If you are unprepared to examine evidence, on the other hand, or deny facts which are staring you in the face, there's obviously a place for you somewhere, but that place is not an institution of democratic governance.
The latter is the usual case: we agree broadly about the facts, but differ strongly on the means by which we redress social evils. And that's why we have political parties offering alternative solutions.
If you are unprepared to examine evidence, on the other hand, or deny facts which are staring you in the face, there's obviously a place for you somewhere, but that place is not an institution of democratic governance.
