cassa - // Does a half born child, with its head still in the birth canal and it’s body outside wriggling and kicking deserve to decapitated and killed? // The use of emotive images and languages does not aid the veracity of your point. And again here - // If you chose to murder your unborn child for what can often be no other reason than ‘I’m too stupid to...
found this on abortion law in the US.
Muted the video at the top of the page, some states have no gestational limit.
Would be nice if there was a consensus on limits, doubt there ever will be tho.
Yes... the problem is that many seem to go with "heartbeat" as significant... without apparent awareness that a foetal heart only beats when pushed by the mother's.
The only clear line, surely, is when a foetus is able theoretically to survive outside somebody else's body? Before then, it is part of somebody else.
""The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother."
Maybe the aBBC doesn't mention it but the mother's 'mental health' comes into the equation as well.
In the US you can buy any opinion you want.
What kind of opinions do you think abortion clinics pay for?
It's not worth taking seriously the idea that mental health would be an excuse for a baby to be born and then killed after birth. That would be classed as murder. Suggesting that it is being made legal is quite simply wrong, let alone irresponsible.
I don't understand, spice? Clearly, the mental health of the mother is essential for a baby. I have no idea who would pay for what, or why. Only the mother will know if she is willing and able to raise and take responsibility for a child for the rest of her life. Can you clarify please? X
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.