I think, FWIW, Jim can be surprisingly and disappointly irrational at times. But naomi, you do seem to go for a negative interpretation if possible.
Only yesterday (I think), I added a suggestion to one of yours, which I think made sense... and got battered down completely.
Yes, to be sure, there's an objective truth. But I don't think there's anyone on this site who can lay claim to it, is all. All the times you've called me irrational I simply don't see it. But we've been there.
TTT, It’s not difficult to ignore that in which you have no interest, but for the record Jim says he’s not going to stop defending himself against undue criticism and neither am I. He’s just accused me of ‘deliberately’ misreading posts, in effect dishonesty, and it’s reasonable to respond to that.
bhg481 - such utter nonsense as you have posted at 9.09 does not deserve an answer, and if you cannot see it as nonsense then I despair even more of the human race!