ChatterBank2 mins ago
Will Priti Useless Actually Do Something This Time?
86 Answers
No doubt more hot air from the Home Secretary who talks the talk but doesnt even crawl the crawl let alone walk the walk.
Either she gets her ass into gear immediately or she should go along with Johnson and Han cock.
Shame really I had really high hopes for "Hang 'em" Patel.
https:/
Either she gets her ass into gear immediately or she should go along with Johnson and Han cock.
Shame really I had really high hopes for "Hang 'em" Patel.
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//No. If the goods are not French and not carried by French transport then that is fine.//
So then, we expect the French to allow their ports to be used to transit beetroots from Romania to the UK and Melton Mowbray pies from Leicestershire to Italy, but they cannot buy our Stilton cheese and we cannot buy their Roquefort. Hmmm.....I can see that working OK.
So then, we expect the French to allow their ports to be used to transit beetroots from Romania to the UK and Melton Mowbray pies from Leicestershire to Italy, but they cannot buy our Stilton cheese and we cannot buy their Roquefort. Hmmm.....I can see that working OK.
One does not abrogate border integrity in order to trade, export/import with the world. It can have nothing to do with being presently forced to keep illegal immigrants. Indeed to do so would actually reinforce the inability to protect one's nation from influx. The ability to secure borders should be the present legal position, not any inability to do so.
NJ > "So then, we expect the French to allow their ports to be used to transit beetroots from Romania ........................."
Who is this "we" NJ ? I certainly have no such expectation ( nor assumption )
O_G > "One does not abrogate border integrity in order to trade, export/import with the world."
Another vague pronoun = "One". No O-G that is *precisely* what the UK does i.e. knowingly abrogates border integrity in order to trade. As does possibly almost every nation on the planet.
The meaning of the rest of your comment is unclear to me, but I know of no body currently forcing us "to keep illegal immigrants", I would return all illegal immigrants to the country where they set out from immediately prior to illegally arriving in the UK.
O_G > "The ability to secure borders should be the present legal position, not any inability to do so."
Yes it "should be the present legal position" and should ALWAYS have been the responsible position, but it was not, and is not, and for the reasons I gave previously in this thread, will likely NEVER be.
Who is this "we" NJ ? I certainly have no such expectation ( nor assumption )
O_G > "One does not abrogate border integrity in order to trade, export/import with the world."
Another vague pronoun = "One". No O-G that is *precisely* what the UK does i.e. knowingly abrogates border integrity in order to trade. As does possibly almost every nation on the planet.
The meaning of the rest of your comment is unclear to me, but I know of no body currently forcing us "to keep illegal immigrants", I would return all illegal immigrants to the country where they set out from immediately prior to illegally arriving in the UK.
O_G > "The ability to secure borders should be the present legal position, not any inability to do so."
Yes it "should be the present legal position" and should ALWAYS have been the responsible position, but it was not, and is not, and for the reasons I gave previously in this thread, will likely NEVER be.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.