News44 mins ago
Why Do Illegal Immigrants Not Apply For Asylum In The E U S S R?
140 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-polit ics-537 23687
We are always being told by the anti British and LibFac hordes that UK is the lowest of the low and heaven lies across the channel. Why then do thousands risk death to get to this "terrible" country. Surely they should apply for asylum in the utopia they are already in. France ain't too bad is it?
We are always being told by the anti British and LibFac hordes that UK is the lowest of the low and heaven lies across the channel. Why then do thousands risk death to get to this "terrible" country. Surely they should apply for asylum in the utopia they are already in. France ain't too bad is it?
Answers
The vast majority of the channel crossers are exploited by people traffickers. The way to deal with this difficult issue is to work with France and other countries to smash these criminal gangs.
10:46 Tue 11th Aug 2020
Thanks for the reply, NJ @17:02. Still, it has to be said that the "first safe country" description is a bit of a myth. Refugees are presumably requi
People traffickers prey on the desperate -- and presumably also on the greedy, but I'd say that if greed were the main/only motivation then you'd wait for something more seaworthy than a bathtub, so I'll go for desperation as the main motivation for those desperate or foolhardy enough to cross the Channel in this way. Same with those getting into freezer compartments on trucks.
Since the desperation isn't going to disappear any time soon, the better target is surely the traffickers rather than the trafficked.
People traffickers prey on the desperate -- and presumably also on the greedy, but I'd say that if greed were the main/only motivation then you'd wait for something more seaworthy than a bathtub, so I'll go for desperation as the main motivation for those desperate or foolhardy enough to cross the Channel in this way. Same with those getting into freezer compartments on trucks.
Since the desperation isn't going to disappear any time soon, the better target is surely the traffickers rather than the trafficked.
Apparently "Ben & Jerry" the ice cream men have waded in:
"Hey @PritiPatel, we think the real crisis is our lack of humanity for people fleeing war, climate change and torture."
//Sounds like a potential Guantanamo Bay though unless all cases could be dealt with promptly. I think solicitors would have a field day//
Needs must. Laws must be changed and if necessary international treaties abandoned. Those treaties and protocols are being abused. They were to protect people from the things that Ben & Jerry seem to believe are going on in Calais. Not to allow young male chancers free rein to enter the UK illegally.
I wonder how much of that there is in Calais.
"Hey @PritiPatel, we think the real crisis is our lack of humanity for people fleeing war, climate change and torture."
//Sounds like a potential Guantanamo Bay though unless all cases could be dealt with promptly. I think solicitors would have a field day//
Needs must. Laws must be changed and if necessary international treaties abandoned. Those treaties and protocols are being abused. They were to protect people from the things that Ben & Jerry seem to believe are going on in Calais. Not to allow young male chancers free rein to enter the UK illegally.
I wonder how much of that there is in Calais.
//And maybe a nice wrought iron sign over the entrance? “Arbeit mekt frei” - now that would have a ring to it, wouldn’t it.//
Indeed it would – but with one critical difference. Those inside the wrought iron gates would not be queuing up for the "showers" and would be perfectly free to leave the UK and try their luck elsewhere. The residents of Auschwitz and similar establishments were not afforded that facility so your attempt at portraying the UK government as the Most Vile and Evil Government Ever to Have Walked The Earth (since 1939, anyway) is somewhat inappropriate.
Indeed it would – but with one critical difference. Those inside the wrought iron gates would not be queuing up for the "showers" and would be perfectly free to leave the UK and try their luck elsewhere. The residents of Auschwitz and similar establishments were not afforded that facility so your attempt at portraying the UK government as the Most Vile and Evil Government Ever to Have Walked The Earth (since 1939, anyway) is somewhat inappropriate.
In fact I think Ben & Jerry's original post says more about them (whoever they are) than the Home Secretary's retort does about her.
To start with, if they want to be taken seriously, it might help if they did not address Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Home Department as "Hey @PrittiPatel". Then they might care to investigate just how much more war, climate change and torture there is in Calais and its environs than there is here in the UK. Until they do I think I'll take what they have to say with a pinch of salt.
To start with, if they want to be taken seriously, it might help if they did not address Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Home Department as "Hey @PrittiPatel". Then they might care to investigate just how much more war, climate change and torture there is in Calais and its environs than there is here in the UK. Until they do I think I'll take what they have to say with a pinch of salt.
They're so determined to get here, that they are willing to drown!!!
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-8 618565/ Migrant s-cross ing-Eng lish-Ch annel-w arn-Bri tain-at tempt-D ROWN-bo ats-sto pped.ht ml
https:/
jim360 . "but the "first safe country" law isn't a thing... Still, it has to be said that the "first safe country" description is a bit of a myth."
Afraid not. Those exact words are used in Dublin III Regulation
Version 3.0 page 6 and 7; and
"The UK remains bound to both the Dublin III Regulation and the Eurodac Regulation during the Transition Period, until 31 December 2020." page 12
We will be fully transitioned after that date, allegedly.
Afraid not. Those exact words are used in Dublin III Regulation
Version 3.0 page 6 and 7; and
"The UK remains bound to both the Dublin III Regulation and the Eurodac Regulation during the Transition Period, until 31 December 2020." page 12
We will be fully transitioned after that date, allegedly.
Article 31 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees which NJ quoted point 1 of, has as point 2
' The Contracting States shall not apply to themovements of such refugees restrictions other than thosewhich are necessary and such restrictions shall only beapplied until their status in the country is regularized orthey obtain admission into another country. TheContracting States shall allow such refugees a reasonableperiod and all the necessary facilities to obtain admissioninto another country."
O_G is correct in saying "Blame lies with the illegal immigrants, the folk abetting them, and a lack of law enforcement preventing illegal action." and of those 3 the guilt of France for not containing the illegal immigrants securely until they have been fully processed and either been deported from France or given the legal right to remain permanently in France is the crucial factor, which permits the problem with the migrants and the folk abetting them to even exist in the first place.
IF France gives the migrants legal right to remain in France it is *still* France's responsibility if they then illegally try to emigrate to the UK.
' The Contracting States shall not apply to themovements of such refugees restrictions other than thosewhich are necessary and such restrictions shall only beapplied until their status in the country is regularized orthey obtain admission into another country. TheContracting States shall allow such refugees a reasonableperiod and all the necessary facilities to obtain admissioninto another country."
O_G is correct in saying "Blame lies with the illegal immigrants, the folk abetting them, and a lack of law enforcement preventing illegal action." and of those 3 the guilt of France for not containing the illegal immigrants securely until they have been fully processed and either been deported from France or given the legal right to remain permanently in France is the crucial factor, which permits the problem with the migrants and the folk abetting them to even exist in the first place.
IF France gives the migrants legal right to remain in France it is *still* France's responsibility if they then illegally try to emigrate to the UK.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.