Ask Naomi.

[Theland]

Naomi, as one of the most well read ABers apparently, I seek your opinion on a two volume book published I think in 2011, called, "Miracles, The Credibility Of New Testament Accounts," by Craig S. Keener.
If you would read the reviews and relate your thoughts I would be most grateful.

[andy-hughes]

Theland - // Naomi, as one of the most well read ABers apparently … //

Nice qualification!!

[andy-hughes]

We cross-posted DD - maybe you were thinking what I was thinking ...

[Theland]

Oh no! What have I done now, apparently?
Posting on here is sometimes like talking to American students - snowflakes, triggered, sensitive, politically correct, offended by the least deviation from the prevailing dogma.
Sorry sorry sorry sorry (cor blimey).

[andy-hughes]

Theland - // Oh no! What have I done now, apparently?
Posting on here is sometimes like talking to American students - snowflakes, triggered, sensitive, politically correct, offended by the least deviation from the prevailing dogma.
Sorry sorry sorry sorry (cor blimey). //

Get off it Theland, faux humility doesn't wash on here - people know you too well.

[Deskdiary]

You could, of course, have simply posted without the word 'apparently'.

I have no clue about religion - it just simply doesn't affect my life - I don't believe, and that's the extent of it. No deep metaphysical musings about why, I just simply don't believe.

But.

And far be it for me to speak in defence of Naomi, but when I do dip in to R&S, she strikes me as being incredibly well-read on matters religious and (dare I say it) more so than you. But given I know nothing about religion she could of course be spouting nonsense (how would I know), so perhaps she's just more eloquent and convincing than you are...

[andy-hughes]

DD - // nd far be it for me to speak in defence of Naomi, but when I do dip in to R&S, she strikes me as being incredibly well-read on matters religious and (dare I say it) more so than you. //

My only perception of Naomi being 'well read' is based on the fact that she tells us of her 'knowledge' with monotonous regularity - but very little evidence to actually prove it, apart from a somewhat high-handed approach to peope she beleives to be less 'well read than she is.

I can say I am a nuclear scientist - but it doesn't mean I am one.

[naomi24]

AH, //she tells us of her 'knowledge' with monotonous regularity//

I don’t tell it - YOU tell it - and with monotonous regularity. Your posts say far more than you imagine. :o}

[Spicerack]

Something a bit creepy about this post, imo.
Suppose I shouldn't really be adding to it.

[Spicerack]

By post I mean thread.^

[ladybirder]

It was fine until Andy joined in as per.

[Theland]

Andy - I bet you have lots of mirrors in your house.

[douglas9401]

On reflection, perhaps not.

[Theland]

:-))

[Peter Pedant]

// Andy - I bet you have lots of mirrors in your house.
On reflection, perhaps not. //

Andy - I bet you have lots of mirrors in your house.
yes - especially in the hall,
all of the mirrors.

[retrocop]

//I can say I am a nuclear scientist - but it doesn't mean I am one. //
But you would probably think you are and at least attempt to give that impression as in all subjects you opine on.

[Peter Pedant]

yeah I keep on telling people I have three Nobel prizes (=tray bright you proles)
but I find uptake - - slight

at least I wont say - oh no I dont, the next day