Film, Media & TV24 mins ago
Mary Wollstonecraft.
13 Answers
While I applaud the idea of a statue, I would have thought a commemorative statue should be of the person concerned, not some modern sculptor's fantasy.
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-engla nd-lond on-5488 6813
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.From your link:
> The Suffolk-based artist said her critics "are not reading the word, the important word, which is on the plinth, quite clearly 'for' Mary Wollstonecraft, it's not 'of' Mary Wollstonecraft." <
The work is celebrating MW's legacy, rather than seeking to be a representation of the woman herself. That makes sense to me but it might be better to refer to the work as a 'sculpture', rather than as a 'statue'.
> The Suffolk-based artist said her critics "are not reading the word, the important word, which is on the plinth, quite clearly 'for' Mary Wollstonecraft, it's not 'of' Mary Wollstonecraft." <
The work is celebrating MW's legacy, rather than seeking to be a representation of the woman herself. That makes sense to me but it might be better to refer to the work as a 'sculpture', rather than as a 'statue'.
I lived in Stoke Newington for 24 years, less than a mile from where the statue has been placed. I know the site where the school was that is mentioned in the report very well because it now houses Stoke Newington Fire Station. But...I never knew there was a school there and I'd never heard (until now) of Mary Wollstonecraft. You live and learn.